Legislature(2001 - 2002)
03/10/2001 10:09 AM House FIN
| Audio | Topic |
|---|
* first hearing in first committee of referral
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
HOUSE BILL NO. 103
An Act making appropriations for the operating and loan
program expenses of state government, for certain
programs, and to capitalize funds; making
appropriations under art. IX, sec. 17(c), Constitution
of the State of Alaska, from the constitutional budget
reserve fund; and providing for an effective date.
HOUSE BILL NO. 104
An Act making appropriations for the operating and
capital expenses of the state's integrated
comprehensive mental health program; and providing for
an effective date.
AMENDMENTS:
MILITARY & VETERANS AFFAIRS
COURT SYSTEM
REVENUE
PUBLIC SAFETY
FISH & GAME
CORRECTIONS
LAW
NATURAL RESOURCES
ADMINISTRATION
TRANSPORTATION & PUBLIC FACILITIES
ENVIRONMENTAL CONSERVATION
COMMUNITY & ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT
MILITARY AND VETERANS AFFAIRS
Co-Chair Mulder MOVED to ADOPT MVA-1. Representative Davies
OBJECTED for discussion. He asked how the amendment would
expand the mission for the Department.
Disaster Planning and Control
Local Emergency Planning Committee Grants
$50.0 ILTF
Co-Chair Mulder explained that the amendment would replace
IA/OILHAZ funds eliminated in the Governor's budget and
would allow for some emergency planning.
Representative Foster noted that the request was part of the
Department's mission. He mentioned that Commissioner's
priorities had not included emergency planning
consideration.
Co-Chair Mulder interjected that emergency planning had been
shifted from the Department of Environmental Conservation to
Department of Military & Veterans Affairs. He added that it
was a mission expansion.
Representative Davies asked where that Division belongs if
it does not belong in the proposed section. Co-Chair Mulder
agreed that it was appropriate for it to be located there.
Representative Davies reiterated the question of how this
would be an expanded role.
Representative Hudson stated that the increment was taken
out of the Response Fund during the Exxon Valdez oil spill.
The emergency response agencies were established primarily
on the basis of putting together oil spill response plans to
provide the oversight in the regions. He suggested that
this was a request for funding outside of that scope and
would expand the scope of those functions.
Representative Foster pointed out that three cents a barrel
was placed into that fund and at that time, oil production
was double what it currently is.
LARRY LABOLLE, STAFF, REPRESENTATIVE FOSTER, explained the
history of the issue and when the transfer from departments
occurred. He commented that the issue is if the department
is going to do all hazards planning, the three cents cannot
be used for that purpose. He exclaimed that this is an
unfunded mandate by law. That is the only funding that has
gone into those grants. Additionally, the Department is the
responding authority for hazards, however, if there were an
oil spill, the Department would not be the lead agency.
There being NO further OBJECTION, the amendment was adopted.
Representative Davies MOVED to ADOPT MVA-2. Co-Chair Mulder
OBJECTED.
Alaska National Guard
Air Guard Facilities Maintenance
$60.0 GF
Representative Davies explained that the Air Guard
Facilities Maintenance component requested an increment of
$60.0 for the management of all State retirement records for
Air and Army National Guard employees. Currently, there is
no State of Alaska employee to manage the program.
The Air and Army National Guard maintains an active record
base of over 3800 members. They also maintain over 108,000
inactive records. The scope of state records management is
extensive. Each time a personnel action occurs during the
career of an Alaska National Guard member, a corresponding
change must occur in that person's state retirement record.
Records management also encompasses calculation of
retirement eligibility, performing periodic state records
audits, and writing and filing any state awards. Perhaps the
most critical duty in records maintenance is calculating
accurate retirement points for computing guard members
retirement benefits.
So far this federal fiscal year, 500 records transactions
were filed for Air Guard members alone. Many of these
transactions take hours to accomplish. Federal employees, to
the detriment of their primary duties, have performed these
actions to date.
Representative J. Davies emphasized that it is critical to
establish a State of Alaska employee to administer the state
program. If not funded, state retirement information for
Guard members will continue to be a burden on federal
employees that maintain the records when they can. Lack of
adequate attention to these records has the potential to
cause late retirement payments to members of the Guard.
Co-Chair Mulder replied that they have functioned without
the position and that each Department has been asked to do
more with less.
A roll call vote was taken on the motion.
IN FAVOR: Davies, Moses, Croft
OPPOSED: Foster, Harris, Hudson, Lancaster, Whitaker,
Bunde, Williams, Mulder
The MOTION FAILED (3-8).
Representative Davies MOVED to ADOPT MVA-3. Co-Chair Mulder
OBJECTED.
Alaska National Guard
State Active Duty
General Fund $107.0
Representative Davies explained that the Department believes
that the Alaska National Guard will see a further erosion of
its ability to recruit and retain members from rural areas
of the State without a concerted effort in that direction.
The Alaska National Guard Scouts have had a long history
with the National Guard. He emphasized that they are unique
in the nation. The Department is losing ground in these
areas and believes this request to fund an Office of Rural
Affairs would assist in the continuation of the Alaska
Scouts.
Co-Chair Mulder mentioned that in the Language Section of
the bill, $250 thousand dollars had been provided for
tuition assistance. He added that last year, seed money had
been provided and that it had been effective. He commented
that effort had been expanded.
A roll call vote was taken on the motion.
IN FAVOR: Davies, Moses, Croft, Foster
OPPOSED: Harris, Hudson, Lancaster, Whitaker, Bunde,
Williams, Mulder
The MOTION FAILED (4-7).
Representative Croft MOVED to ADOPT MVA-4. Co-Chair Mulder
OBJECTED.
Alaska Military Youth Academy $111.8 GF Match
Representative Croft stated that to reduce the Food Service
increment by $111.8 in the general fund match would have a
significant impact on the Military Youth Academy.
He clarified that it would reduce the Academy's chance to
have adequate funding for the employees who prepare and
serve meals to the cadets in the program. The $111.8 is
needed to help solve the long term staffing problem at the
dining facility.
If the reduction remains, the Academy will have to take
drastic measures to assure the ability to stay within its
overall budget authorization. They might have to consider
switching to serving a cold breakfast, a hot lunch, and a
sack dinner. The cut would cause a significant disruption
to the cadet's training schedule, physical training, and
academics. The proposed cut could cause the cadet's
cooperative work experience in which they learn culinary
skills in the dining facility.
Co-Chair Mulder commented that there had been an allowance
in by the Subcommittee. He added that the increment had
been allocated the required 40% match.
Representative Davies commented that this issue would
continue to reappear in the budget. If the State does not
cover State employees appropriately, it will be increasingly
difficult to recruit. He stressed that compensation levels
are not competitive in the State of Alaska.
Co-Chair Mulder acknowledged that the work that those
employees do is a "labor of love" and knew that there exists
a "burn out" factor. He noted that the Subcommittee
proposed funding for two-thirds of the increase.
Representative Croft commended Representative Foster for
doing good job in funding the priorities. He reiterated
that this program is wonderful and that it should be funded
appropriately. He questioned the right policy choice.
A roll call vote was taken on the motion.
IN FAVOR: Davies, Moses, Croft
OPPOSED: Foster, Harris, Hudson, Lancaster, Whitaker,
Bunde, Williams, Mulder
The MOTION FAILED (3-8).
Representative Davies amended [sds1]MVA-5 to $40.8; and
changed the funding source to ILTF. [sds2] Representative J.
Davies MOVED to ADOPT the amended MVA-5. Co-Chair Mulder
OBJECTED.
Disaster Planning and Control
Local Emergency Planning Committee Grants
$40.8 ILTF
Representative Davies stated that the Subcommittee had
referred the request to the full House Finance Committee for
review accompanied with a comment that this is not typically
one of DMVA's primary missions and should not come from the
general fund allocation for DMVA.
The Governor's budget supported replacing general funds for
the FY02 projected shortfall of $69.8 in Oil & Hazardous
Response Funding (OHRF). The shortfall is based on the
statutory level of 3% funding from the OHRF. In addition,
the Governor's budget addressed the issue of the LEPC's,
looking at all hazards by adding $21.0 more to the general
fund as compared to last year's budget.
Representative J. Davies continued, without these funds, the
LEPC budgets would have to be reduced proportionately. The
consequence of that action would be that the LEPC's would be
meeting less and that the State would be less prepared to
respond to disasters.
Co-Chair Mulder countered that there is a very limited
amount of ILTF this year and the potion not used in MVA-#1
will be used in another amendment during the budget process.
Representative Croft sited a memo from Jan Henry,
Coordinator, Office of Emergency Management, Kenai
Peninsula, in support of the expanded funding. He spoke to
the "bare bones" funding.
A roll call vote was taken on the motion.
IN FAVOR: Davies, Moses, Croft
OPPOSED: Foster, Harris, Hudson, Lancaster, Whitaker,
Bunde, Williams, Mulder
The MOTION FAILED (3-8).
Representative Davies MOVED MVA-6 in order to address his
concern. Co-Chair Mulder OBJECTED.
Alaska National Guard Benefits
$100.0 GF
Representative Davies pointed out, in the Front Section,
Section 5, there had been money allocated for this concern.
With that understanding, Representative J. Davies WITHDREW
MVA-#6. He noted that the Subcommittee had referred the
request to the full House Finance Committee for review.
Representative Foster voiced his appreciation for all the
cooperation given by the Subcommittee.
THE ALASKA COURT SYSTEM
No amendments.
DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE
Representative Whitaker MOVED to ADOPT REVENUE-1.
Representative Whitaker explained that the purpose of the
amendment would add a Deputy Director position to the staff
of the Trust Authority. The position would assist the
Executive Director in managing the increased workload
associated with the transfer of administration of the Office
of the Long Term Care ombudsman to the Alaska Mental Health
Trust Authority (AMHTA). The Deputy Director will assist in
the general day to day management of the Authority, thereby,
freeing the Executive Director to devote more time pursuing
partnership opportunities which could significantly improve
the results gained from the investment of Trust income.
There being NO OBJECTION, REVENUE-#1 was adopted.
Co-Chair Mulder MOVED to ADOPT REVENUE-#2. Representative
J. Davies OBJECTED for discussion.
Denny DeWitt, Staff, Representative Eldon Mulder, explained
the technical change that the amendment would address. He
noted that the printed draft failed to remove language on
Page 27, line 22, "Other funds include 125,000 from the
Constitutional Budget Reserve (CBR) Fund". The money would
be included and counted in the language section in Section
8©.
Representative Whitaker stated that he would not object to
the proposed amendment. Representative J. Davies WITHDREW
the objection. There being NO further OBJECTIONS, it was
adopted.
Representative Davies MOVED to ADOPT REVNUE-#3.
ADD:
Department Revenue
BRU Permanent Fund Dividend
Component Permanent Fund Dividend
FUND SOURCE AMOUNT
PFD Fund $116.5
Representative J. Davies explained that the House
Subcommittee had closed out prior to the amendment
submission. There being NO OBJECTION, REVENUE-#3 was
adopted.
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY
Vice-Chair Bunde MOVED to adopt DPS-#1. Representative
Davies OBJECTED for a question.
Department of Public Safety
(Council on Domestic Violence and Sexual Assault)
BRU: Fish and Wildlife Protection
Component: Enforcement and Investigative Services Unit
Delete: 150.0 General Fund
Add: 150.0 Fish and Game
BRU: Alaska State Trooper Detachments
Component: Alaska State Trooper Detachments
Delete: 120.0 General Fund
BRU: Council on Domestic Violence and Sexual Assault
Component: Council on Domestic Violence and Sexual
Assault
Add: 200.0 Federal Funds
Add: 270.0 General Fund
Vice-Chair Bunde explained that the amendment would add
$450.0 in funding for direct victim services through shelter
programs. He added that $20.0 was used by the Council to
provide funding to address administration of the grant. The
amendment is possible due to:
· Receipt of $200.0 in additional grant funding
noticed by the federal Office of Mandatory Grants,
Family Violence Prevention & Services, subsequent to
Subcommittee closeout.
· Elimination of a forecasted shortfall in Fish and
Game Fund receipts thereby allowing a net zero fund
source change in the Division of Fish and Wildlife
Protection that frees up $150.0 GF that can be
reallocated to the Council.
· Reduction to the increment for trooper recruitment
efforts by $120.0. It would reallocate those funds
to CDVSA victim services to sustain FY 2001 victim
service levels.
Representative Croft claimed that the proposed amendment
could alleviate concerns voiced by the Counsel.
Representative Davies asked if those funds would be replaced
somewhere in the budget.
There being NO further OBJECTION, DPS-#1 was adopted.
Representative Moses MOVED to ADOPT DPS-#2. Vice-Chair
Bunde OBJECTED.
ADD:
Department of Public Safety
Fish & wildlife Protection
Enforcement & Investigative Services Unit
FUND SOURCE: AMOUNT
General Funds $1,280.0
Representative Moses advised that the amendment would
provide eight new FWP commissioned officers to provide
critical fish and wildlife enforcement.
Representative Moses noted that two of the ten FWP State
Troopers requested by the Governor are funded by the
Subcommittee proposal. Without the approval of all ten FWP
troopers improving resource protection in important but
minimally patrolled regions of the State would not be
possible. Fundamental fish and game management objectives
would not be achieved in those enforcement areas unable to
be patrolled. Resource users would continue to access those
areas without adequate patrol and user contact made by Fish
and Wildlife Troopers.
Vice-Chair Bunde agreed, noting that the Subcommittee placed
$320 thousand dollars into the budget for new brown shirt
positions.
Representative Croft stated that the State could expect to
see the amount of money generated from enforcement decrease
as the enforcement commitment goes down.
TAPE HFC 01 - 43, Side B
Representative Croft recalled that this type of concern is
what the State fought for during statehood. He stressed
that the increment pays for management.
Vice-Chair Bunde did not believe that this would be a
revenue source that the State could predict. Representative
Davies interjected that is the issue and should be taken
into account. He asked if the State expected any fine
recovery from that activity. Vice-Chair Bunde noted that
the fines collected go to the general fund.
Representative Hudson noted that the there has been concern
voiced regarding "creek robbing". There has been a
suggestion that the industry that live on the fish, there
should be a measure or tax of around 1% for that enforcement
cost. He acknowledged that would be a whole new initiative.
KENNETH BISCHOFF, DIRECTOR, DIVISION OF ADMINISTRATIVE
SERVICES, DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY, concurred that every
year there are cases in which those funds are necessary.
There is language in the language section of the bill, which
appropriates the funds to the fish and game fund. Every
year, there are cases that generate fines. He acknowledged
that it became a sensitive closeout issue and that it was an
unstable revenue source.
Representative Moses concluded that doubling the number
would be not adequate. He emphasized that it is the State's
obligation to protect the resource. The non-residents are
the "real" violators; it has become a money making deal.
The residents are asking for the additional protection to
protect the State's resource.
A roll call vote was taken on the motion.
IN FAVOR: Davies, Moses, Croft
OPPOSED: Foster, Harris, Hudson, Lancaster, Whitaker,
Bunde, Williams, Mulder
The MOTION FAILED (3-8).
Representative Moses MOVED to ADOPT DPS-#3. Vice-Chair
Bunde OBJECTED.
ADD:
Department of Public Safety
Criminal Investigations Bureau
FUND SOURCE AMOUNT
General Funds $89.5
Representative Moses explained that the money would fund a
portion of the costs for one new trooper for the Statewide
Drug Enforcement Unit in the AST Criminal Investigations
Bureau.
One of the ten new Alaska State Troopers requested by the
Governor to funded by general funds was included under the
subcommittee proposal in the AST Detachments BRU. Without
the additional nine troopers, the Alaska State Troopers'
field operations will continue as it has in the past, which
is in a purely "reactive" mode. The new trooper positions
would have allowed AST to become "proactive" and get
involved in "community policing".
Representative Moses emphasized that this funding was
seriously needed throughout the State.
Vice-Chair Bunde agreed that further drug enforcement was
needed. He pointed out that there is funding for four new
blue shirts.
Representative Davies spoke to the need for additional
troopers for the category for community policing aspects of
the concern. He emphasized how under-staffed the troopers
are throughout the State. He stressed the tragic level of
State law enforcement.
A roll call vote was taken on the motion.
IN FAVOR: Davies, Moses, Croft
OPPOSED: Foster, Harris, Hudson, Lancaster, Whitaker,
Bunde, Williams
Co-Chair Mulder was not present for the vote.
The MOTION FAILED (3-8).
Representative Moses MOVED to ADOPT DPS-#4. Vice-Chair
Bunde OBJECTED.
ADD:
Department of Public Safety
Alaska State Trooper Detachments
FUND SOURCE AMOUNT
General Funds $1,350.1
Representative Moses explained that the amendment would fund
eight new troopers and related costs. One of the ten new
Alaska State Troopers requested by the Governor to be funded
by general funds was included under the Subcommittee
proposal in the AST Detachment BRU.
Representative Moses stated that without the additional
troopers, the Alaska State Troopers' field operations will
continue as it has been in the past, which is in a purely
"reactive" mode. The new trooper positions would have
allowed AST to become "proactive" and get involved in
"community policing".
Representative Davies reiterated that the fact is the State
is seriously understaffed right now. The State Troopers are
totally in an emergency mode. They have virtually no time
to do any preventative efforts. He provided a graph of the
staffing levels for the State Troopers since 1980. He
pointed out the drastic drop since 1987. Additionally,
since 1994, the levels have been continually cut, however,
the population continues to increase. Representative J.
Davies emphasized that the need is very real with the climb
of the population.
Representative Lancaster concurred that the need would never
decrease and added that the funding source is the concern.
He did not believe that it was a program receipt based
concern.
Representative Croft commented that this is where the
"rubber hits the road" in concerns with public safety. He
reiterated that funding has been flat for a decade, while
the population has increased.
Representative Davies emphasized that public safety is a
core section of government. He believed that the general
fund is the source from which the concern should be funded.
He added that a personal income tax could help to address
these concerns. Representative J. Davies noted that
virtually every other state in the nation has some form of
state income tax. That money serves the core functions of
government. He stressed that there is a "disconnect" in
Alaska's State budget. He predicted that the problems are
going to get worse. The question is how can Alaska address
the core needs.
Vice-Chair Bunde agreed that public safety is core to
central government. He suggested that adequate coverage
changes from area to area. He maintained that the proposed
budget reflects what the majority of Alaska's citizens
believe is adequate.
Co-Chair Williams agreed that the State needs to come up
with a long-term fiscal plan. He indicated that he was
confident that there would be a plan that would come before
the Committee, which would address the "whole" concern.
Representative Moses countered that State government does
have the resources to pay for citizen's safety. He advised
that he will continue to do what is right for the State, not
what will get him reelected to office. He stressed that was
an obligation of each representative in State government.
Representative Croft agreed with the need for the long-range
fiscal plan. He commented, however, the question before the
Committee is if the amount proposed for the operating budget
for public safety an adequate level of State spending for
public safety.
Representative Hudson made the comparison of spending needs
versus the funding stream. He encouraged Committee members
to work together to determine that revenue steam.
Representative Whitaker advised that the ability to pay for
the service is what the discussion is about. He maintained
that during a period of an economic decline, it would be
dangerous to propose growth. He believed that State
government should provide for economic growth.
Representative Davies agreed that the concern continues to
be a fundamental economic problem. He agreed with the
need for investments in the basic State infrastructure that
allow business to flourish. Currently, the State is
constraining business because the State is not issuing
permits on time. The Alaskan economy has not achieved a
balance for the economy to work from. He recommended that
the Legislature has to prime the pump.
*TAPE HFC 01 - 44, Side A
Representative Davies stated that the numbers are arbitrary
and are based on the revenue stream.
Co-Chair Williams reiterated that most of the concerns are
valid, however, it is important to keep in mind the long-
term fiscal plan. The Governor's proposal recommends
spending more than expected revenues. He stressed the need
for a long-term fiscal plan. He emphasized the need to keep
spending down until there is a long-range plan.
Representative Croft questioned if anyone thought the
funding level for the Alaska State Troopers was adequate and
emphasized that public safety should be funded.
Representative Moses noted that the state has money in
savings accounts, yet basic needs are not being addressed.
Representative Whitaker maintained that there is interest in
a long-term plan and estimated that a plan would be
developed before the end of the session.
A roll call vote was taken on the motion to adopt DPS-#4.
IN FAVOR: Croft, Davies, Foster, Moses
OPPOSED: Bunde, Harris, Hudson, Lancaster, Whitaker,
Mulder, Williams
The MOTION FAILED (4-7).
Representative Moses MOVED to ADOPT Amendment DPS-5:
ADD
Department: Public Safety
BRU: Alaska State Trooper Detachments
Component: Alaska State Trooper Detachments
Fund Source Amount
General Funds $838.0
Explanation:
Fund 8 constables for the rural law enforcement
initiative.
The impact of reduction of $838.0 GF provides no
funding for eight new constables requested by the
Governor. The intent of this increment request was to
establish a local certified police officer presence in
rural areas of AST jurisdiction. The Department of
Public Safety has long advocated that successful law
enforcement is dependent upon an effort that includes a
traditional and regular law enforcement presence as
well as other pro-active programs that address
educational, social and community concerns. The
constables, through their long-term residency in
communities promote that concept. Education on
important topics such as alcohol, drug and inhalant
abuse, boating safety, search and rescue, and domestic
violence help build an efficient and responsive public
safety presence, thereby improving service and the
relationships with individuals in these communities.
Representative Moses spoke in support of the amendment.
Vice-Chair Bunde pointed out that there are $15 million
dollars in federal funds appropriated for VPSO programs. He
expressed the hope that these funds would supplant the need
for constables. He suggested that current programs be
adequately funded before new programs are created.
Representative Davies spoke in support of the amendment. He
maintained that the federal appropriation would address VPSO
programs and not constable programs. He emphasized that the
federal intent is not to supplant the state effort. He
emphasized that the constable program is a different
approach to solving problems in rural Alaska and should be
funded.
Representative Moses maintained that the funds appropriated
to the Alaska Federation of Natives (AFN) were not intended
to be used for VPSO support. He understood that the funds
were intended for alcohol related rural problems.
Co-Chair Mulder pointed out that the request would be an
addition to the status quo budget and an expansion of
current services. He spoke against the amendment. He
questioned if the constable approach would be the most cost
efficient.
Vice-Chair Bunde noted that a trooper costs $160 thousand
dollars a year and a constable costs $130 thousand dollars.
Representative Croft referred to the $15 million dollars
that Senator Stevens secured for rural areas. He noted that
the federal funds are limited to dry communities. He did not
think that the grant could be used for anything that the
state is not already doing. He did not think the grant could
be used for constables.
A roll call vote was taken on the motion.
IN FAVOR: Moses, Croft, Davies
OPPOSED: Bunde, Foster, Harris, Hudson, Lancaster,
Whitaker, Mulder, Williams
The MOTION FAILED (3-8).
Representative Moses MOVED to ADOPT Amendment DPS-6:
ADD
Department: Public Safety
BRU: Alaska State Trooper Detachments
Component: Alaska State Trooper Detachments
Fund Source Amount
General Funds $100.0
Explanation:
Fund three new vehicles for Alaska State Troopers.
The subcommittee proposal to reduce $100.0 in GF will
provide no funding to purchase 3 new trooper vehicles.
These new vehicles were to help replace an aging
emergency response vehicle fleet.
Representative Moses spoke in support of the amendment and
emphasized the need to provide first class equipment.
Co-Chair Mulder suggested that the amendment should be
addressed in the capital budget.
Representative Hudson agreed and pointed out that vehicles
would come out of equipment fleet replacement funds.
KENNETH BISCHOFF, DIRECTOR, DIVISION OF ADMINISTRATIVE
SERVICES, DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION clarified that
capital projects are $25 thousand dollars or more. The
request could be a capital project.
ANNALEE MCCONNELL, DIRECTOR, OFFICE OF MANAGEMENT AND
BUDGET, OFFICE OF THE GOVERNOR did not think that it would
be good policy to fund individual vehicles in the capital
budget. Mr. Bischoff explained that the request funds the
regular vehicles used by troopers. Ms. McConnell emphasized
that it is an on-going expense through the Equipment Fleet.
She felt that funding of the request through the operating
budget would be consistent with current practice. It is not
a one-time item.
Mr. Bischoff explained that agencies are responsible for
budgeting for the up front cost of an new vehicles. From
that point the agency would pay the Department of
Administration for replacement cost, so that there would be
enough funds in the capital budget to replace the vehicle.
He noted that the trooper fleet is at a level where
replacement needs to be accelerated.
A roll call vote was taken on the motion.
IN FAVOR: Moses, Croft, Davies
OPPOSED: Bunde, Foster, Harris, Hudson, Lancaster,
Whitaker, Mulder, Williams
The MOTION FAILED (3-8).
Representative Moses MOVED to ADOPT Amendment DPS-7:
ADD
Department: Public Safety
BRU: Village Public Safety Officer Program
Component: Contracts
Fund Source Amount
General Funds $828.5
Explanation:
Fund 15% VPSO salary increase as part of the rural law
enforcement initiative.
The impact of this proposal is that there will be no
salary increase for VPSOs. Turnover rates among VPSOs
have been very high. Several actions are needed: (1)
improved Trooper oversight; (2) better equipment; and
(3) a much-needed salary increase. In the past few
years, AST has beefed up "oversight" support of the
VPSOs, offered more training, and has purchased better
equipment for the current VPSOs. This has in part
caused the turnover rate to drop from a rate of 41% in
FY1998 to a rate of 29.6% in FY2000. A salary increase
is needed to reduce this rate further.
Representative Moses spoke in support of the amendment. HE
felt that VPSO's were overdue for an increase.
Vice-Chair Bunde spoke against the amendment. He was not
confident that a raise would reduce the turnover rate. He
pointed out that VPSO officers have the difficult situation
of having to arrest or deal in an enforcement role with
their friends and relations.
Representative Davies argued that the turnover rate has been
reduced due to improved working conditions: better trooper
oversight training, retirement programs and equipment. He
suggested that an increase in salary would assist in
reducing turnover and is appropriate. He noted that housing
is also an issue. He stressed that the fundamental question
would be: is the salary high enough and suggested that
studies would show that the raise would be appropriate.
Representative Moses spoke in support of the amendment and
noted the difficulty that VPSO offices in the community face
when arresting friends and relatives. He added that they are
called on at all hours of the night.
Representative Croft noted that the subcommittee recognized
the AFN grant and indicated that it could be used to support
the raises. He maintained that the grant cannot be used to
support the raise. Co-Chair Mulder stated that he is not
convinced that it could not be used to support raises in dry
areas.
Representative Croft noted that the Subcommittee discussed
the request in relationship to use of the federal grant.
Representative Davies suggested that increased salaries at
non-dry villages could be matched to dry villages by the
grant. He maintained that salaries could not be increased
only for dry villages.
Representative Croft stressed that the grant only applies to
dry villages.
Representative Davies pointed out that because of the
connection between alcohol and crime the need is greater in
wet communities.
A roll call vote was taken on the motion.
IN FAVOR: Moses, Croft, Davies, Foster
OPPOSED: Bunde, Harris, Hudson, Lancaster, Whitaker,
Mulder, Williams
The MOTION FAILED (4-7).
Representative Moses MOVED to ADOPT Amendment DPS-8:
ADD
Department: Public Safety
BRU: Village Public Safety Officer Program
Component: Contracts
Fund Source Amount
General Funds $1,152.1
Explanation:
Fund 20 new village public safety officers as part of
the rural law enforcement initiative.
The impact of this proposal is that the number of
funded VPSOs will continue at present levels.
Currently, there are 73 communities without a VPSO or
an Alaska Police Standards Council (APSC) certified law
enforcement officer. Without the 20 new VPSOs with
support costs, up to 20 rural villages will not have
the resident "first responder" to public safety
emergencies.
Representative Moses spoke in support of the amendment. He
stressed that VPSO's are badly needed in many villages.
Vice-Chair Bunde acknowledged that the federal grant can
only be used for dry villages but emphasized that the
restriction is a "carrot" to go dry. He argued against the
amendment.
Representative Croft stated that it is a poor use of state
government to take a federal grant as an excuse not to pay
for a core function of state government.
Vice-Chair Bunde pointed out that the VPSO program has been
administered by Native organizations.
Representative Moses reiterated that the intent of the grant
was to assist communities that wanted to go dry and that the
inclusion of VPSO's was an attempt to prevent the shipping
of alcohol into these communities. He spoke to the need to
reduce bootlegging.
A roll call vote was taken on the motion.
IN FAVOR: Moses, Croft, Davies, Foster, Whitaker
OPPOSED: Bunde, Harris, Hudson, Lancaster, Mulder
Co-Chair Williams was absent from the vote.
The MOTION FAILED (5-5).
Representative Moses WITHDREW Amendment DPS-9:
ADD
Department: Public Safety
BRU: Village Public Safety Officer Program
Component: Support
Fund Source Amount
General Funds $60.4
Representative Davies MOVED to ADOPT Amendment DPS-10:
Alaska State Troopers
Judicial Services
ADD
$3,725.9 GF
Representative Davies spoke in support of the amendment. He
observed that the request would support increased court
safety. He noted that the Alaska Court System has made the
request for a number of years and stressed the need for
funding. The program was begun with 30 authorized positions
in 1988; there are currently 32 positions. In the past 12
years additional judges have been added in a number of
communities.
TAPE HFC 01 - 44, Side B
Representative Davies continued to speak in support of the
amendment. He stressed that demand has increased,
diminishing the service. He questioned how long it would be
until there is a violent incident. He observed the need for
court security officers around the state.
Co-Chair Mulder acknowledged that the request has been
before the legislature for a number of years. He recognized
that the threat [of a violent incident] exists and added
that there are scarce resources. He observed that the state
troopers are doing a good job.
Representative Davies pointed out that in Anchorage there
are three separate buildings with 40 court rooms and two
court security officers.
A roll call vote was taken on the motion.
IN FAVOR: Moses, Croft, Davies
OPPOSED: Bunde, Foster, Harris, Hudson, Lancaster,
Whitaker, Mulder, Williams
The MOTION FAILED (3-8).
SENATOR ROBIN TAYLOR noted that the Department of Public
Safety has a fleet of five helicopters and two aircraft
capable of long-range patrol. One of the aircraft is used to
transport the Governor and is not being used for public
safety related uses. He maintained that the funding for the
aircraft is contained in the Department of Fish and Game's
budget and should be transferred into the Governor's budget.
He suggested that the transfer would free funding in the
Department of Public Safety for trooper use. Senator Taylor
noted Petersburg has been without a state trooper for the
past five years.
Senator Taylor noted that the Commissioner of Department of
Public Safety had removed six officers from their office
space in Anchorage in order to create a suite of offices for
the Commissioner's Office.
RECESSED
The Committee recessed at 12:50 p.m.
RECONVENED
The Committee reconvened at 1:20 p.m.
Representative Davies MOVED to ADOPT Amendment PS-11:
Alaska State Troopers
Search and Rescue
Add
$350.0 GF
Vice-Chair Bunde OBJECTED.
Representative Davies spoke in support of the amendment. He
noted that the funds would go for avalanche training and
search.
Vice-Chair Bunde spoke against the amendment. He suggested
that money might not prevent "young males" from taking the
risks and that further investment may not prevent further
incidents.
Co-Chair Mulder stressed that he is sympathetic to the
families that have sustained loss, but emphasized that
government cannot protect people from themselves. He
emphasized that the avalanches are in remote areas. He did
not think the additional funds would prevent incidents.
Representative Croft stressed that there is a difference
between outlawing activities and educating people about
where the dangers are the worst. Public education fills the
gap and reduces risk. He felt it was a small investment. He
noted that the amendment would fund the education component.
Representative Davies added that the amendment would also
fund additional search and rescue equipment.
Representative Davies stressed the need for education and
felt that the money would be well spent. Co-Chair Mulder
pointed out that registration fees for snowmobiles could be
raised with the excess to be spent on an educational
campaign.
Representative Hudson agreed that an addition to the
licensing fee or a fee on the acquisition of equipment could
be used to build a fund to prevent unsafe operations.
Vice-Chair Bunde stated that he would support legislation to
address age and speed limitation for use of snowmobiles.
Representative Lancaster spoke against further regulation.
A roll call vote was taken on the motion to adopt Amendment
PS-11.
IN FAVOR: Moses, Croft, Davies
OPPOSED: Bunde, Foster, Harris, Hudson, Lancaster,
Whitaker, Mulder
Co-Chair Williams was absent from the vote.
The MOTION FAILED (3-7).
Representative Moses HELD Amendment DPS-12:
ADD
Department: Public Safety
BRU: Alaska State Trooper Detachments
Component: Alaska State Trooper Detachments
Fund Source Amount
General Funds $22.7
Explanation:
Fully fund law enforcement recruitment effort. The
subcommittee proposal provides funding for $127.3 of
the $150.0 needed for law enforcement recruitment.
Representative Croft Held Amendment PS-13 (copy on file.)
Department of Fish and Game
Co-Chair Mulder MOVED to ADOPT Amendment FG-1:
ADD
Agency Dept. of Fish & Game
BRU Administration and Support
Component Boards of Fisheries & Game
Fund Source Amount
General Funds $66.6
Purpose: Restores Boards FY01 reduction of $56.6 and
addition of $10.0.
Co-Chair Mulder observed that there are a number of
contentious issues before the Board in the next year. There
being NO OBJECTION, it was so ordered.
Representative Moses MOVED to ADOPT Amendment FG-2:
ADD (page 13, line 33):
AGY. Dept. of Fish & Game
BRU. Habitat
COM. Habitat $100.0 General Funds
PURPOSE: To increase funding for fish and wildlife
habitat protection in the context of increasing oil and
gas exploration, and to allow the department to try to
catch up with early review and permitting functions
regarding this exploration.
Representative Moses spoke in support of the amendment. He
pointed out that the Division of Habitat is currently behind
in their work and emphasized that there would be additional
demand with [proposals for] a gas pipeline.
Vice-Chair Bunde pointed out that the request was not a top
priority of the Department of Fish and Game. Co-Chair Mulder
added additional funding can be appropriated if the gas
pipeline comes on line.
Representative Davies acknowledged that it may not be the
highest priority of the Department of Fish and Game, but
emphasized that it would be a high priority for those
concerned with oil and gas exploration. He stressed the
impact on permitting. He observed that problems can be
avoided when the department works with industry during the
initial stages.
Ms. McConnell observed that the funds would be used for
items outside of the gas pipeline.
Vice-Chair Bunde felt that permitting would not be adversely
affected.
A roll call vote was taken on the motion.
IN FAVOR: Moses, Croft, Davies
OPPOSED: Bunde, Foster, Harris, Hudson, Lancaster,
Whitaker, Mulder, Williams
The MOTION FAILED (3-8).
Department of Corrections
Representative Mulder MOVED to ADOPT Amended Amendment DOC-1:
DELETE
Agency Dept. of Corrections
BRU Administration & Operations
Component Inmate Health Care
Fund Source Amount
General Funds $231.1
ADD
Agency Dept. of Corrections
BRU Administration & Operations
Component Inmate Health Care
Fund Source Amount
PFD Fund $231.1
ADD
Agency Dept. of Corrections
BRU Administration & Operations
Component Community Jails
Fund Source Amount
General Funds $200.0
ADD
Agency Dept. of Corrections
BRU Operations and Administration
Component Anchorage Jail
Fund Source Amount
General Funds $31.1
Purpose: Replace General Funds in Inmate Health Care
with PFD Funds. Increase funding to Community Jails by
200.0 and Existing Community Residential Centers by
$31.1.
Co-Chair Mulder spoke in support of the amendment. He
observed that the amount of permanent fund dividends funds
were recently updated. There being NO OBJECTION, it was so
ordered.
Representative Mulder MOVED to ADOPT Amendment DOC-2:
ADD
Agency Dept. of Corrections
BRU Administration & Operations
Component Anchorage Jail
Fund Source Amount
General Funds $600.0
Co-Chair Mulder explained that the Anchorage Jail was short
funded. The amendment would bring the appropriation to within
$20 thousand dollars of the original request. He explained
that the Anchorage Jail item is broken down into three
components: Anchorage Jail, Sixth Avenue Jail, and out-of-
state. Transition costs are not evident because the Anchorage
Jail is coming on in mid-stream
There being NO OBJECTION, it was so ordered.
Co-Chair Mulder MOVED to ADOPT Amendment DOC-3:
ADD
Agency Dept. of Corrections
BRU Community Residential Centers
Component Existing Community Residential Centers
Fund Source Amount
General Funds $900.0
Co-Chair Mulder explained that the funding source would be
general funds. The department's budget would be $2.1 million
dollars above the allocation with the addition of Amendments
COR-1 through COR-4. He noted that he was unable to find
additional funding sources.
TAPE HFC 01 - 45, Side A
There being NO OBJECTION, Department of Corrections-#3 was
adopted.
Co-Chair Mulder MOVED to ADOPT DOC-#4.
ADD:
Dept. of Corrections
Out of State Contracts
Out of State Contracts
FUND SOURCE AMOUNT
General Funds $500.0
Co-Chair Mulder explained that the increment would replace
the lost Violent Offender Incarceration Funds. He noted
that there reason that there was a decrement to the out-of-
state contract established in last year's timetable. He
stated that next year, there would be one hundred taken from
each out-of-state and transition them back into the
Anchorage jail. He added that they were conservative in what
could be saved.
There being NO OBJECTION, Department of Corrections-#4 was
adopted.
Representative J. Davies commented on Department of
Corrections-#5 and requested that the Department speak to
the concern.
ADD:
Department: Corrections
BRU: Out of State Contracts
Component: Out of State Contracts
FUND SOURCE AMOUNT
General Fund $890.0
DWAYNE PEEPLES, DIRECTOR, ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES,
DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, stated that the Governor's
proposal had factored in the phasing of prisoners out of
Arizona. The replacement of $500 thousand of loss of
federal funds has been adopted. The remaining $390 thousand
dollars would leave the Department a number of beds to be
procured in out-of-state beds at about 18 on a 12-month
basis.
Representative J. Davies asked if supplemental funding would
be considered if the need was there.
Co-Chair Mulder commented that the inmate population has
been relatively stable. He added that the Legislature has
been willing to meet the Department's needs and that the
Subcommittee went the conservative number.
Representative Davies WITHDREW DOC-#5.
Representative J. Davies WITHDREW DOC-#6, which is a
duplication of DOC-#3.
Representative J. Davies MOVED to ADOPT DOC-#7. Co-Chair
Mulder OBJECTED.
ADD:
Department Department of Corrections
BRU Administrations and Operations
Component Institution Director's Office
FUND SOURCE AMOUNT
General Fund $100.0
Representative Davies explained that the Division of
institutions oversees twelve Institutions, ten community
residential center contract sites, fifteen community jail
contracts, Electronic Monitoring Programs, inmate health
care, out-of-state contracts and inmate programs providing
incarceration and supervision of approximately 4,500 inmates
a month. The Director of Institutions utilizes the two
assistant director positions to provide Division management
and oversight of the above program areas as well as bringing
the Anchorage Jail on-line.
Mr. Peeples added that in addition, the positions assist the
Division in development, implementation and operations of
juvenile and women's programs within Institutions. The two
programs are the fastest growing segments of institutional
service demands and that the Director of Institutions
requires assistance from these positions to provide overall
management. He added that consistent management and
oversight are critical to the safety and security of
prisoners incarcerated throughout the State and in out of
State contract facilities and to the delivery of
rehabilitative services.
Co-Chair Mulder responded that the State is no longer
dealing with the Cleary compliance issues. He believed that
would free up personnel to address other issues.
Representative Davies commented that the need for the
management of the prison populations is not going to go
away. The State needs to continue to do that management if
the State does not want to go into another Court settlement.
Mr. Peeples advised that the Department is going into an
aggressive stance in becoming ACL accredited, which would
provide for maintenance of nationally accepted standards.
He emphasized that one of the requested assistant positions
would be addressing that concern.
Representative Davies MOVED to AMEND the amendment to
indicate $100 thousand dollars general funds.
Co-Chair Mulder commented on the budget options that were
available to the Subcommittee. He indicated that he had
chose to allow flexibility and latitude for management. He
stated that whether the component is funded or not, the
function would be filled regardless.
Representative Davies inquired if there would be an
unallocated reduction. Co-Chair Mulder replied that the
intent is to take a conservative approach.
A roll call vote was taken on the motion.
IN FAVOR: Davies, Moses, Croft
OPPOSED: Foster, Harris, Hudson, Lancaster, Whitaker,
Bunde, Williams, Mulder
The MOTION FAILED (3-8).
Representative Davies MOVED to ADOPT DOC-#8. Co-Chair
Mulder OBJECTED.
ADD:
Department Department of Corrections
BRU Administration and Operations
Component Inmate Programs
FUND SOURCE AMOUNT
General Fund $226.0
Representative Davies explained that the impact of not
funding $226.0 for the Inmate Substance Abuse Treatment
(ISAT) program would be that the Department would not
sustain current service levels. A significant number of
inmates are incarcerated due to alcohol related behavior
issues. Alcohol is a public health problem and the
Department needs to pursue continued treatment rather than
reduced treatment. The funds do not create new programs but
would sustain services at the current level. These services
include assessments, education, treatment in individual and
group settings, and post release planning for aftercare in
the community. The public is pursuing greater penalties and
more substance abuse programming for incarcerated felony
Driving While Intoxicated (DWI) cases. Representative J.
Davies stressed that it would be a step backwards to cut the
ISAT programs.
Co-Chair Mulder explained that this should be an increment
in the mental health budget and noted that it was not in the
House Majority's priority list.
Mr. Peeples commented that the request would handle status
quo replacement adjustments for the alcohol and substance
abuse contract programs. The program has not received any
increase for the last six to ten years; however, there are
more and more demands on the programs. He emphasized that
this has been an on-going issue for many years.
Co-Chair Mulder responded that there had been dollars placed
into that component. Representative Davies stressed that the
State is funding a status quo effort. Co-Chair Mulder
pointed out that the Department of Corrections budget will
increase this year by $3 million dollars.
A roll call vote was taken on the motion.
IN FAVOR: Davies, Moses, Croft
OPPOSED: Foster, Harris, Hudson, Lancaster, Whitaker,
Bunde, Williams, Mulder
The MOTION FAILED (3-8).
Representative Croft MOVED to adopt DOC-#9. Co-Chair Mulder
OBJECTED.
ADD:
Department Department of Corrections
BRU Administrations and Operations
Component Inmate Health Care
FUND SOURCE AMOUNT
General Fund $654.0
Representative Croft explained that due to difficulties in
recruiting and retaining some of the 84 health care
professionals, $654.5 general fund dollars are needed in the
Inmate Health Component to enable the Agency to provide a
two-range salary increase to all Nurse's, Licensed Practical
Nurse's, and Health Practitioner's working at correctional
institutions. He pointed out that Alaska is not competitive
in wages paid to health practitioners or skilled and semi-
skilled nursing positions. The two-range increase would
place the State of Alaska in the competitive arena, but not
on the leading edge. Without the funding, the Department
will have to reduce medical staff in the 24-hour
institutions by approximately 12 to 14 positions.
Co-Chair Mulder explained that last year; the Subcommittee
requested that the Department reduce overall nursing levels
by ten. The Department reduced the level by seven
positions. The Department refused to contract that out.
With the proposed pay raise for nurses, he suggested that it
would be better to contract it out in the private sector.
He believed that the Department views institutions like a
"hospital", providing nursing on 24-hour bases. He stated
that was not justified.
Mr. Peeples responded that this is a complex issue. He
admitted that the Department has provided a "hard" review of
the nursing staff. He noted that there has been some
reconfiguration. He noted that not all institutions are
7/24 status. In the heavy booking institutions, Title 47
requires a 7/24 status. There needs to be better medical
records. There are other things that the Department can do
for cost control mechanisms; however, it will take time to
"shake-down".
Co-Chair Mulder asked if the ACA standards required the
level of nursing that the Department currently provides.
Mr. Peeples responded that in a high booking facility, there
must be coverage.
Representative Croft questioned how could the Department not
provide that 7/24 service. Mr. Peeples replied that the
alternative could be a "tele-nurse".
Representative Croft asked if that was how the positions had
been reduced. Mr. Peeples stated it was, however, noted
that it is very complex issue. There must be a chief
medical staff doctor on duty at all times.
Representative Croft stressed that the Department needs the
funding to fund the service. He stressed that health care
costs are increasing. Co-Chair Mulder interjected that the
Subcommittee addressed if there were other ways that the
Department could address effective health care.
Representative Davies explained that there is a fundamental
difference between the inmate population and us. He
emphasized that there needs to be a plan in place to deal
with emergencies. The concern is that there are over 80
nurses on staff and salaries that are below the standard.
He stressed that is why there is an increasing shortage of
nurses.
Co-Chair Mulder reiterated that the Subcommittee is
attempting to address these concerns.
Representative Davies asked if this is an issue that the
Department has been struggling with. Mr. Peeples explained
that there is staff in the institutions that deal with the
chronically mentally ill.
Representative Croft reiterated the potential danger that
exists without the proposed funding.
A roll call vote was taken on the motion.
IN FAVOR: Davies, Moses, Croft
OPPOSED: Foster, Harris, Hudson, Lancaster, Whitaker,
Bunde, Williams, Mulder
The MOTION FAILED (3-8).
Representative Croft MOVED to AMEND DOC-#10.
ADD:
Department Department of Corrections
BRU Administration and Operations
Component Anchorage Jail
FUND SOURCE AMOUNT
General Fund $650.5 (DELETE)
General Fund/Pr. Receipts $230.0
Representative Croft asked for Mr. Peeples to address the
component.
Mr. Peeples explained that the general fund program receipts
are the Municipal of Anchorage payments through the State
for operating the Anchorage Jail. In the Governor's
request, they came in with a different designation. Co-
Chair Mulder stated that they came into the Governor's
budget as Statutory Designated Program Receipts (SDPR). He
noted that would not qualify as statutory language.
Representative Croft clarified that money should go to
Department of Corrections. Co-Chair Mulder stated that the
money would go into the general fund.
Representative Croft asked if $650 thousand dollars would be
the correct amount of money needed by the Department. Mr.
Peeples advised that the reduction from the Governor's
request was $880 thousand dollars to bring open the jail.
The Department based it budget plan on that amount.
Representative Croft noted that he would delete the general
fund portion of the request. He MOVED to ADOPT the amended
DOC-#10. Co-Chair Mulder OBJECTED. He reiterated the
intent was to take the conservative approach.
A roll call vote was taken on the motion.
IN FAVOR: Davies, Moses, Croft
OPPOSED: Foster, Harris, Hudson, Lancaster, Whitaker,
Bunde, Williams, Mulder
The MOTION FAILED (3-8).
Representative Croft MOVED to ADOPT DOC-#11. Co-Chair
Mulder OBJECTED.
ADD:
Department Department of Corrections
BRU Administration & Operations
Component 6th Avenue Correctional Center
FUND SOURCE AMOUNT
General Fund $670.0
Representative Croft explained that the Sixth Avenue
Correctional Center would require $670.0 thousand general
fund dollars to enable it to operate fully in the final year
of operations as a state-operated correctional center. When
the final construction on the new Anchorage Jail is
completed, all Sixth Avenue operations (staff, prisoners,
and operating funds) will be transferred to the new facility
to enable full operations of that facility. Without the
$670.0 general fund dollars, the new Anchorage Jail facility
will be short funded and unable to cover operational needs.
Mr. Peeples stated that bringing up the new Anchorage jail
includes three budget components.
· Out-of-state;
· The Sixth Avenue site; and
· The new Anchorage Jail.
The new jail replaces the Sixth Avenue jail. The
Department's budget was predicated on recruiting and
training staff.
TAPE HFC 01 - 45, Side B
Mr. Peeples explained that the new jail would be a pre-trial
facility. HB 53 mandate was that the new jail budget
financing would be $6 million dollars plus the existing
Sixth Avenue existing budget. He advised that without the
proposed component, the operating budget for FY02 would be
incomplete to meet the time frames.
Co-Chair Mulder interjected that bringing the new Anchorage
Jail on line would not be increasing the number of inmates.
He believed that it should be more operational efficiencies.
Representative Croft countered that the transition will
cost.
A roll call vote was taken on the motion.
IN FAVOR: Davies, Moses, Croft
OPPOSED: Foster, Harris, Hudson, Lancaster, Whitaker,
Bunde, Williams, Mulder
The MOTION FAILED (3-8).
Representative Davies MOVED to AMEND DOC-#12. Representative
J. Davies MOVED to ADOPT the amended DOC-#12. Co-Chair
Mulder OBJECTED.
ADD:
Department Department of Corrections
BRU Administration and Operations
Component Community Jails
FUND SOURCE AMOUNT
General Fund $200.0
Co-Chair Mulder asked if felon's funds could be used in the
proposed manner.
ANNALEE MCCONNELL, DIRECTOR, OFFICE OF MANAGEMENT AND
BUDGET, OFFICE OF THE GOVERNOR, commented that they could be
used for inmate related programs distinct from
incarceration.
Representative Davies noted that the contract amounts had
been established in 1996 and have not changed in six years
while the cost of living has continued to increase.
Co-Chair Mulder explained that this year he had "backed up"
and currently the Department contracts nearly $84 dollars
per day. He noted that Dillingham is running at about 135%
capacity, Kotzebue is about 110% capacity. He realized that
there is prison inmate overcrowding. He believed that the
$200 thousand dollars allocated in an earlier amendment
would help to address that concern.
Representative Davies voiced his concern in loosing the beds
if the component is not adequately funded. Co-Chair Mulder
explained that the reality is less than 50% occupancy at $84
dollars per day.
A roll call vote was taken on the motion.
IN FAVOR: Davies, Moses, Croft
OPPOSED: Foster, Harris, Lancaster, Whitaker, Bunde,
Williams, Mulder
Representative Hudson was not present for the vote.
The MOTION FAILED (3-7).
Representative Moses WITHDREW DOC-13.
Representative Croft MOVED to ADOPT DOC-#14. Co-Chair
Mulder OBJECTED.
ADD:
Department Department of Corrections
BRU Administration and Operations
Component Office of the Commissioner
FUND SOURCE AMOUNT
General Funds $205.6
Representative Croft explained that the funds would support
a Strategic Planner and Special Assistant to the
Commissioner. The Strategic Planner position is responsible
for supervising several critical public policy issues
including, the implementation of HB 214 which was enacted
into law last year (the Prisoner Litigation Reform Act).
He continued, the legislation and the Department's
commitment to compliance with court mandates in the Cleary
suit, make the position essential to continue with
Department efforts to implement PLRA and prevent court
oversight of institutional activities. In that role, the
position was the principal writer of the Department's Long-
Range Plan and the person tasked with coordination of
American Correctional Association (ACA) accreditation of the
institutions in order to mitigate against future lawsuits
such as Cleary.
Representative Croft noted that the Special Assistant
position is critical to the Office of the Commissioner. The
position is tasked with many special projects including
policy and procedures, freedom of information act, subpoena
for records and legal actions, human resource complaints,
media relations, public contacts and responses to
legislative inquiries. Without the positions, the
Department will not have adequate management staff to
implement PLRA and ACA standards and prevent court
oversight.
Co-Chair Mulder replied that the Subcommittee had not
recommended the strategic planner position. The funding for
the special assistant was transferred to Mental Health
function. Representative Croft pointed out the substantial
decrease to that component. He noted that without the
amendment, there would be a 30% reduction to the Office of
the Commissioner.
A roll call vote was taken on the motion.
IN FAVOR: Davies, Moses, Croft
OPPOSED: Foster, Harris, Hudson, Lancaster, Whitaker,
Bunde, Williams, Mulder
The MOTION FAILED (3-8).
DEPARTMENT OF LAW
Jim Whitaker MOVED to ADOPT LAW-1.
ADD:
Department Department of Law
BRU Criminal Division (33)
Component Third Judicial District:
Anchorage (2261)
FUND SOURCE AMOUNT
1007 I/A Receipts $200.0
Representative Whitaker explained that the amendment would
enable the Division to receive a portion of federal funding
to support the joint effort between the Departments of
Public Safety and Law in an effort to reduce alcohol related
crime through aggressive investigation and prosecution of
bootlegging offenses. The funding will provide for one
additional prosecutor and related costs in Anchorage.
Representative Whitaker noted that the House Finance
Subcommittee on the Department of Public Safety had approved
the Public Safety portion of this federal funding within
their budget.
There being NO OBJECTION, LAW-1 was adopted.
Representative Jim Whitaker MOVED to ADOPT LAW-2.
ADD:
Department Department of Law
BRU Criminal Division (33)
Component Fourth Judicial District
FUND SOURCE AMOUNT
1007 I/A Receipts $300.0
Representative Whitaker explained that the amendment would
enable the Division to receive a portion of federal funding
to support the joint effort between the Departments of
Public Safety and Law in an effort to reduce alcohol related
crime through aggressive investigation and prosecution of
bootlegging offenses. It would provide for an additional
prosecutor, paralegal and related costs in Bethel.
Representative Whitaker added that the House Finance
Subcommittee on the Department of Public Safety approved the
Public Safety portion of this federal funding within their
budget.
There being NO OBJECTION, LAW-#2 was adopted.
DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES
Representative Hudson MOVED to ADOPT DNR-1.
ADD:
Agency Department of Natural Resources
BRU Oil and Gas Development
Component Oil and Gas Development
FUND SOURCE AMOUNT
General Fund $425.0
Representative Hudson provided information regarding the
amendment. He noted that the Division of Oil & Gas had
requested an amendment increment of $425,000 to the FY02
Operating Budget; in order to fund salary increases for key
positions in the exempt service. Funding of the increment
would allow the Division's professional, oil and gas
salaries to be competitive with the salaries of its
counterparts in the federal government.
The Division needs to retain these experts because subtle
changes in interpretation of geologic and engineering data
has the effect of changing the State's royalty revenues by f
millions of dollars per oil field. Retaining and recruiting
people with the necessary skills and experience could
greatly affect the return to the permanent fund and the
general fund.
Representative Davies voiced support of the amendment.
There being NO OBJECTION, DNR-#1 was adopted.
Representative Davies MOVED to ADOPT DNR-#2. Representative
Hudson OBJECTED.
ADD:
Department Department of Natural Resources
BRU Statewide Fire Suppression Program
Component Fire Suppression
FUND SOURCE AMOUNT
General Fund $350.0
Representative Davies stated that not funding the incremental
request would have negative impacts on safe and cost effective
suppression of wildland fires in Alaska. The increment is
needed to supplement the Division's current staff of initial
attack firefighters with a trained, qualified and mobile cadre
of firefighters. The Division does not have adequate staffing
in its forest technician series to meet their responsibility
of suppressing wildland fires in the wildland-urban interface
areas of the State. During periods of normal fire activity,
the Division currently relies on inexperienced emergency
firefighters (EFF) to routinely staff its initial attack
engines and helicopters. The EFF's are not as well-trained
and experienced as forest technicians because they can only be
hired when there are fires to fight. They do not have the
opportunity to receive the same level of training and
experience as forest technicians.
Trained and highly skilled firefighters have a much better
chance of successfully and safely carrying out an initial
attack on wildland fires and suppressing them at minimal acres
burned and minimal cost. A typical wildland fire in the urban
interface can cost anywhere from $300 to $5000 dollars if the
initial attack is successful. When a wildland fire escapes
initial attack and becomes an extended attack or project fire,
the costs to suppress them increase exponentially. The 2,777-
acre Clear Fire (located near Nenana) that occurred last
summer, cost $2.6 million to suppress. Large fires, such as
the Miller's Reach Fire in 1996, could easily cost $500.0 to
$1,000.0 dollars per day and can last two to three weeks. He
advised that the suppression costs for the Miller's Reach Fire
was $15.0 million.
Representative J. Davies noted that wildland fire fighting is
a dangerous profession and the use of minimally trained and
inexperienced firefighters is ill advised. Consequently, when
there is a shortage of firefighters and the Division is forced
to rely on EFF, the State is also forced to be less aggressive
on initial attack because we will not compromise the safety of
any firefighter on initial attack or any other related fire
suppression operations. The end result of this fact is that
there could be more escaped fires in the urban interface
areas. An escaped fire can cost millions of dollars to
suppress and result in significant potential loss of public
and private property.
The population in Alaska continues to move into and develop
the wildland-urban interface areas of the State. Currently,
the MatSu Valley is the fastest growing area of Alaska and a
great deal of that valley has the potential for more costly
urban interface fires like the Miller's Reach Fire in 1996,
and Helmaur Road Fire in 1999. An added fire risk is the
catastrophic spruce beetle infestation that has decimated
timber stands in several areas in the State including the
Anchorage Bowl and the Kenai Peninsula. These spruce beetle
killed stands of timber overlap with the urban interface areas
of the State, thereby, increasing the potential for a
disastrous wildland fire should it escape initial attack.
Representative Hudson commented that the Subcommittee did not
underestimate the power of early on attacking fires. He noted
that it had not been well articulated by the Department. He
agreed that the concept is a component that should be
considered at a later date.
Representative Lancaster questioned what would be used for
equipment and transportation. Representative Davies responded
that the Department does have the equipment they need but do
not have the staffing. He pointed out that this would be an
increment used during the fire season, and would not be full
time positions.
In response to Vice-Chair Bunde, Representative Davies
explained that Bureau of Land Management (BLM) has twenty
times the staff that the State does. The fact is that the
increment would train people to do rapid attacks around the
State.
NICO BUS, ADMINSTRATIVE SERVICES MANAGER, DIVISION OF SUPPORT
SERVICES, DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES, voiced surprise
with the comments of Representative Hudson He noted that the
request had been submitted since the original Governor's
budget. He urged that the Committee consider this component,
as it is a life safety issue. He noted that the crews do not
conflict with the "hot shot" crews and noted that the
Department does not have the manpower to implement it.
A roll call vote was taken on the motion.
IN FAVOR: Davies, Moses, Croft
OPPOSED: Foster, Harris, Hudson, Lancaster, Bunde,
Williams, Mulder
Representative Whitaker was not present for the vote.
The MOTION FAILED (3-7).
Representative Croft MOVED to ADOPT DNR-#3. Representative
Hudson OBJECTED.
ADD:
Department Department of Natural Resources
BRU Information/Data Management
Component Information Resource Management
FUND SOURCE AMOUNT
General Fund $72.5
Representative Croft explained that the Land Status Graphic
Record system is used by the public and government agencies
to access land status information. Although land status
records are available on-line, the access is of limited use
due to a 9-month update backlog.
He noted that the Department receives an average of 15,000
land transactions that need to be entered in to the Land
Status Graphic Record system. The existing average backlog
of 9 months is unacceptable to both internal and external
users who need these records to be current within 30 days.
He advised that the projected FY2002 backlog amounts to over
11,000 pending actions. Representative Croft noted that by
adding one additional cartographer, the backlog workload
could be cut about 25% per year.
The primary users of the graphic land records include:
· Mining industry for managing mineral property
rights;
· Oil and gas industry to assure public notification
of leases, right-of-ways, water rights, and material
sales;
· Forest products industry for state timber sales;
· Alaskans looking for land to purchase or lease;
· Agricultural industry for locating specially
designated agriculture lands and agriculture land
sales; and
· All resource managers, especially DNR managers and
staff, who rely on plats for day-to-day permitting
decision support and documentation.
Each of these important resource based user communities
suffer when dependable land records are not available from
the State.
Representative Croft stated that operating staff in the
Status Graphic Unit was steadily reduced from 19 positions
in 1990 to 10.2 in FY01. While automation has permitted
fewer staff to accomplish more work, it cannot fully
compensate for the staff reductions. Although each
cartographer now produces 50% more output than 12 years ago,
an additional cartographer is needed to reduce the backlog.
A reduction in the backlog, resulting in more current land
records, will have a direct and positive impact on
permitting of economic development activities.
TAPE HFC 01 - 46, Side A
Representative Croft acknowledged that the request would not
solve all the problems, but maintained that it would be a
step in the right direction.
Representative Hudson noted that this Division has made
significant strides in automating and streamlining the
system. He acknowledged that there is a nine-month backlog,
but explained that the request was not a high enough
priority to be funded above other increments.
Representative Harris questioned if it was a priority of the
Alaska Miner's Association. Representative Hudson did not
know.
Mr. Bus stated that the project is important in determining
mining claims, right of ways, and timber sales. Industry has
endorsed initiatives funded through the federal government.
The request shows the pictorial display. The capital budget
would address the land use database system.
Representative Davies pointed out that the department staff
uses the data to answer questions by industry. Failure to
fund the request could result in delays.
A roll call vote was taken on the motion.
IN FAVOR: Moses, Croft, Davies, Foster
OPPOSED: Bunde, Harris, Hudson, Lancaster, Mulder, Williams
Representative Whitaker was absent from the vote.
The MOTION FAILED (4-6).
Representative Croft MOVED to ADOPT Amendment DNR-4:
ADD
Department of Natural Resources
Parks & Recreation Management
Parks Management
Fund Source Amount
General Fund $160.0
($100.0) for Wood-Tikchik State Park
America's largest state park, Wood-Tikchik, will
continue to be staffed at an embarrassingly low level.
Currently one staff person manages an area larger than
the state of Delaware, 1.6 million acres. Park use in
the past 10 years has steadily climbed and additional
ranger staff, assigned to year-round responsibilities,
is desperately needed. Without this new position, there
will continue to be no routine patrolling in over half
the park. This increment also included funds for
maintenance of an aircraft (to be secured through the
Department of Public Safety at no cost to Parks).
Without an aircraft and a ranger/pilot, the upper lake
systems will not see regular patrol. The increased
conflicts between hunting guides, and between guides
and private hunters will continue with no possibility
of resolution. Recommendations from the revision of the
park management plan to resolve the hunter conflicts
and resource impacts from both guided and non-guided
park visitors cannot be implemented without a field
presence.
($60.0) for Park Maintenance
The general condition of the state parks in Alaska is
terrible and we are hearing that statement from the
public regularly. State Parks has identified $42
million in deferred maintenance needs in our 120 park
units. Last year, one of the outhouses was so rotten a
woman fell through and a park road was so bad it broke
a motor home axle. While we
attempt to keep up with the worst situations, we are
now unable to do so. All of the maintenance staff is
seasonal. This funding would extend their seasons so
they can address more of the maintenance needs of the
park system. This increase in person months will be
spread throughout the park system and will compliment a
CIP request for Park Emergency Repairs. Without this
increment, we will simply continue to defer maintenance
needs with the hope that those needs involving health
and safety don't result in a visitor injury. This
increment does not address all of the park maintenance
needs, but at this point, even a small amount of
additional funding will be immediately put to good use
on those problems that can cause the most injury to
park visitors and the most liability to the state.
Search & Rescue needs will continue to increase without
additional staff to make contact with an ever-
increasing number of non-guided visitors from the Lower
48, as well
as Alaskans not experienced in wilderness travel.
Publicity in national magazines (Outside and Alaska)
has drawn attention to Wood-Tikchik as an easily
accessible wilderness experience. Air taxi operators
rent boats and gear, making travel by those with little
or no wilderness experience easy. Contact with visitors
before they get into trouble with wildlife, private
property, or the weather is the cheapest form of
insurance.
Three years ago, the native allotment issue in Wood-
Tikchik was solved when conservation easements were
offered to the over 100 park in holders. Virtually all
the allotment holders took the easement, which allowed
the Bureau of Land Management to move forward with
conveying the land. Every month, additional patented
private land is being conveyed and park staff has a
dual responsibility regarding these lands. Many people
assume all the land in the park is public land. It is
important for many reasons that park visitors
understand that there are over 100 parcels of private
property averaging 80 acres each. It is also important
to monitor the conservation easements to ensure that
they are being implemented properly. This, in and of
itself, would be a full time job for someone. But it is
just one of the many responsibilities of our current
sole park ranger.
Revenue generation opportunity at the new boat ramp at
Lake Aleknagik will suffer without regular attention to
fee compliance. With only one ranger, there will be far
less time spent at the boat ramp than if there were two
rangers. The boat ramp is the most heavily used
facility in the park and ranger presence is needed to
ensure smooth operation of a facility that can see
upwards of 400 trucks and trailers on a busy weekend.
With the needs of the boat ramp taking the current
ranger's time and attention, there will be less
backcountry patrol.
There is currently NO presence in the park during the
winter months. Winter use in the park is growing as
snow machine use becomes more reliable and people
discover the ease with which one can travel on a frozen
lake. Ranger contact with these recreators before they
leave (most will leave from the boat launch) to ensure
proper equipment and understanding of the weather and
terrain could prevent most winter search and rescue
operations. Winter activities, such as dog races, are
starting to occur in the park and NO staff is available
to administer these programs and permits. At risk are
park resources.
By legislative direction, the management of Wood-
Tikchik is by a management council consisting primarily
of local residents. Without someone locally available
to keep in touch with these management council members,
it is difficult to secure a quorum for meetings. For
each meeting held, at least four are cancelled because
of quorum problems. This is a highly inefficient use of
staff and volunteer time. A year-round staff person in
Dillingham would increase the participation by the
council through regular in-person contact.
With no staff at the boat launch in the winter, we
expect vandalism. From our experience at other sites
accessible in the winter, a year-round ranger presence
would greatly deter
vandalism.
Representative Croft argued in support of the amendment. He
stressed that it would be a modest step to support the
highest priority areas.
Representative Hudson noted that the subcommittee focused on
economic development and the water permitting system. He
observed that rangers could be relocated from smaller parks.
A roll call vote was taken on the motion.
IN FAVOR: Moses, Croft, Davies
OPPOSED: Bunde, Foster, Harris, Hudson, Lancaster,Williams
The MOTION FAILED (3-6).
Representative Croft MOVED to ADOPT Amendment DNR-5
ADD
Department of Natural Resources
Information/Data Management
Interdepartmental Data Processing Chargeback
Fund Source Amount
General Fund $57.5
Technology changes are driving improvements in government
business practices; technical expertise is essential for
finding reliable solutions to problems identified by DNR
staff and the public. Conversely, inadequate staffing
means slow response times to solving users' network or
computer issues, which in turn cuts worker productivity
and limits the value of DNR's services and information to
the public. This funding would add one additional data
processing technician.
This position is needed to assure an acceptable level of
computer support for the Palmer and MatSu staff,
especially during the high demand fire season. There are
about 93 network devices in Palmer alone, about half of
them are at the new Forestry fire facility, the others
are in the Recorder's Office, State Parks, and the
Division of Agriculture. Also, the Division of
Agriculture's Plant Material Center is projected to
increase their staffing due to an influx of federal
monies and thus will require more computer support.
This increment request only addresses the demands that
are critical for maintaining DNR's widely distributed
computing and data communications network. DNR staff now
support an average of 192 network devices per technical
person. An acceptable industry average is 75 devices per
technical person. DNR network staff has 2.5 times the
industry average workload. Personal computers now have a
central role in our office environments, 949 devices are
supported across the department; the Computer Information
Center staff covers 766 of these. One additional position
will drop the ratio to only twice the industry average
(vs. the current 2.5 times the industry average).
Without the requested position, the Anchorage staff will
have to continue to support the MatSu/Palmer areas. This
doesn't provide responsive action to the timing needs of
the Palmer Offices and is an inefficient and cumbersome
use of the Anchorage staff.
Representative Croft spoke in support of the amendment. He
suggested that statutory designated program receipts would
allow the increments to be funded and pointed out that the cap
is driving the reduction.
Representative Hudson acknowledged that it would be good to
have a permanent full time data processing technician, but
emphasized that the budget was reviewed with priorities in
mind. He stated that he would support the request if further
funding were available.
Representative Davies spoke in support of the amendment. He
maintained that the level of support was not sufficient.
A roll call vote was taken on the motion.
IN FAVOR: Moses, Croft, Davies
OPPOSED: Harris, Hudson, Lancaster, Mulder, Williams
Representatives Foster, Whitaker and Bunde were absent from
the vote.
The MOTION FAILED (3-5).
Representative Davies MOVED to ADOPT Amendment DNR-6:
ADD
Department of Natural Resources
Minerals, Land & Water Development
Claims, Permits & Leases
Fund Source Amount
General Fund $160.0
Results of recent geophysical exploration indicate the
potential for a significant deposit of minerals in the
Denali Block area. As the public became aware that DNR
recently requested the entitlement of the eastern
portion of the Denali Block area to be on BLM's
conveyance priority list, the mining industry has
communicated considerable interest in assuring that
this conveyance occurs. That is, the industry has
reinforced the importance of the area to upcoming
exploration and expenditures.
Representative Davies spoke in support of the amendment. The
area has great archaeological importance and is used
extensively for recreation and subsistence. There is also a
significant mineral potential. The mining industry does not
want to have to access the area under federal rules.
Representative Hudson explained that the request was
difficult for the Subcommittee. He acknowledged the need and
emphasized that there is an issue of timing. The request is
not a necessity for the next fiscal year.
A roll call vote was taken on the motion.
IN FAVOR: Croft, Davies
OPPOSED: Bunde, Foster, Harris, Hudson, Lancaster,
Whitaker, Mulder, William
Representative Moses was absent from the vote.
The MOTION FAILED (2-8).
Representative Davies WITHDREW Amendment DNR-7
ADD
Department of Natural Resources
Oil and Gas Development
Fund Source Amount
General Fund 425.0
Department of Administration
Representative Ken Lancaster MOVED to ADOPT Amendment ADMIN-
1:
DELETE
BRU: Alaska Longevity Programs Management
Component:Pioneers Homes
Fund Source Amount
General Funds $ 140.5
ADD
BRU: Senior Services
Component:Senior Employment Services
Fund Source Amount
General Funds $ 140.5
Purpose:
The reduction will correct a technical error; funding
is for nursing increases addressed through fiscal note
in legislation. The increment will fund 144 senior
employment positions statewide to cover cost
differential of their existing pay levels of low-income
seniors employed through community agencies and the new
federally imposed hourly wage limit. ($6.50)
Representative Lancaster There being NO OBJECTION, it was so
ordered.
Representative Lancaster MOVED to ADOPT Amendment ADMIN-2
Public Communications Services
Satellite Infrastructure
$750 thousand dollars General fund
$550 thousand dollars SDPR
This will allow the department to secure Satellite
services and require the department to develop a
revenue source for the portion of the satellite used
for ARCS. The contract should be limited to a base of 2
years with renewal options. The telecommunication
availability is rapidly changing, as is equipment. The
state should not lock itself into any long-term
contracts without taking advantage of new opportunities
that will become available in Alaska within the next
two years.
Co-Chair Mulder explained that the amendment relates to the
transponder. The issue is the increased ATT contract costs.
There are four channels on the transponder: public
television, Gavel to Gavel, educational television and The
Alaska Rural Communications Service. Six public radio
stations and the Emergency Broadcasting System are also
beamed. The request would look at the possibility of
collecting receipts from the commercial entities utilizing
the services. The commercial stations have not been
contacted.
Representative Davies pointed out that the amendment is $300
thousand dollars less than the original request. He added
that the statutory designated program receipts are not
certain.
Co-Chair Mulder clarified that the actual amount of the
contract is $300 thousand dollars less than the request. He
maintained that it was not his intent to interfere with the
contract, but to get the accurate amount.
Representative Davies recognized the strategy of forcing
efficiencies but questioned the recourse if it cannot be
negotiated with the appropriated amount. Co-Chair Mulder
responded that that some of the transmission could be
blackened.
Representative Davies expressed support for the attempt but
questioned what would be jeopardized if commercial entities
were not willing to come up with the funding. He asked if
there would be an ability to go before the Legislative
Budget and Audit Committee for additional funds.
DAN SPENCER, DIRECTOR, DIVISION OF ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES,
DEPARTMENT OF ADMINISTRATION clarified that the original
request was $1.6 million dollars in general funds. The
tariff would not be filled until June. There is currently
$900 thousand dollars. The amendment would provide eight
months of service if the contract were negotiated at $1.6
million dollars. He observed that there would be an
opportunity to come before the legislature for a
supplemental before the lights are turned off. He observed
that previous discussions to collect program receipts have
not been fruitful. He noted that the vendor could not be
forced. He stressed that the service is essential.
Co-Chair Mulder noted that the current amount paid to AT&T
is $800 thousand dollars. The new proposal is for $2.1
million dollars.
Representative Hudson noted that a shortfall would not occur
before February 2002.
There being NO OBJECTION, it was so ordered.
RECESSED
The Committee recessed at 4:03 p.m.
RECONVENED
The Committee reconvened 5:45 p.m.
Representative Davies MOVED to ADOPT Amendment ADMIN-3:
Leases
Leases
Add: 1,900.0 GF
Explanation:
This would provide full funding of FY'02 request.
Leases were short funded last year and there is a FY'01
supplemental request of 1,600.0 GF. Payment will have
to be made now or later through supplemental process
next year.
Representative Davies observed that this component has been
under funded for the past 11 years. The FY01 supplemental
was $1.6 million dollars. He questioned the wisdom of
purposely under funding this component.
Co-Chair Mulder acknowledged that the leasing appropriation
has been conservative as a means to encourage the department
to achieve some efficiency. Leasing costs have been reduced
over the past 15 years. He referred to problems in the
Division of Motor Vehicle's lease space. The department
needs to pursue a good deal for the state.
TAPE HFC 01 - 46, Side B
Representative Davies acknowledged the concern, but felt
that the Division of Motor Vehicles' lease space was an
extreme example. He suggested that steps be taken to cover
such instances through the Legislative Budget and Audit
Committee.
Representative Lancaster clarified that his allocation did
not allow the Subcommittee to fund the component.
Representative Croft pointed out that under-funding would
not change where the money comes from it would only move it
to the supplemental. It undermines the public's confidence
that the budget is being correctly represented.
A roll call vote was taken on the motion.
IN FAVOR: Moses, Croft, Davies
OPPOSED: Bunde, Foster, Harris, Hudson, Lancaster,
Whitaker, Mulder, Williams
The MOTION FAILED (3-8).
Representative Croft MOVED to ADOPT Amendment ADMIN-4:
Leases
Lease Administration
Add: 13.5 GF
55.7 IA Receipts
Representative Croft explained that the amendment would
restore the subcommittee reduction by funding one
contracting officer position. He stressed that the position
is needed to manage the leases.
Representative Lancaster emphasized that the functions have
been adequately handled for the past 12 years without the
additional positions.
A roll call vote was taken on the motion.
IN FAVOR: Moses, Croft, Davies
OPPOSED: Bunde, Foster, Harris, Hudson, Lancaster,
Whitaker, Mulder, Williams
The MOTION FAILED (3-8).
Representative Davies WITHDREW Amendment ADMIN-5:
Public Communications Services
Satellite Infrastructure
Add: 1,600.0 GF
Representative Croft MOVED to ADOPT Amendment ADMIN-6:
Senior Services
Protection, Community Services & Administration
Add: 447.3 GF
Representative Croft explained that the amendment would
fully fund the general relief grants for vulnerable adults
at the FY'02 requested level. The cost of this program is
entirely dependent on caseload. A supplemental request will
be made next year if funding falls short of caseload growth.
There is a FY'01 supplemental request of 150.0. He stressed
that it supports the poor.
Representative Lancaster noted that the Subcommittee had a
lot of debate on the item. The Subcommittee did not have the
allocation to cover the cost.
Representative Davies maintained that the cost would be
driven to the supplemental due to an arbitrary cap.
Discussion ensued regarding the Governor's statutory
amendment deadline.
Representative Davies maintained that the component would be
under-funded if the caseload were similar to the previous
year. He maintained that the component should be funded at
the expected level.
Representative Croft pointed out that the item would be
funded as a supplemental. He WITHDREW Amendment DOA-6.
Co-Chair Mulder noted that the Committee had never not
funded senior services.
Representative Davies MOVED to ADOPT Amendment ADMIN-7:
Legal and Advocacy Services
Office of Public Advocacy
Add: 600.0 GF
Explanation:
This increment will fully fund OPA at the FY'02
requested level. This request is based on overall
caseload projections, which indicate this shortfall
amount for FY'02. OPA provides legal representation for
vulnerable Alaskans and also serves as guardians.
Clients include abused and neglected children,
incapacitated adults and indigent criminal defendants
when the Public Defender Agency has a conflict of
interest.
Representative Davies pointed out that the Subcommittee
funded the component below the current year's level of
funding and concluded that there would be a need for a
supplemental appropriation. He added that the courts drive
the caseload. He observed that 60 percent of the money goes
to private attorneys.
Representative Lancaster noted that the Subcommittee had a
lot of debate on the item and that the department presented
a strong case, but the Subcommittee did not have the
allocation to cover the cost.
A roll call vote was taken on the motion.
IN FAVOR: Moses, Croft, Davies
OPPOSED: Bunde, Foster, Harris, Hudson, Lancaster,
Whitaker, Mulder, Williams
The MOTION FAILED (3-8).
Representative Croft MOVED to ADOPT Amendment ADMIN-8
Legal and Advocacy Services
Office of Public Advocacy
Add: 75.0 GF/MH
Representative Croft explained that the request would fund
one of the four guardianship positions requested by the
Alaska Mental Health Trust Authority in the mental health
budget. He stressed that children and other vulnerable
persons receive the services.
Representative Lancaster agreed that the need is growing,
but explained that there was not a solid funding source for
the appropriation.
A roll call vote was taken on the motion.
IN FAVOR: Moses, Croft, Davies
OPPOSED: Bunde, Foster, Harris, Hudson, Lancaster,
Whitaker, Mulder, Williams
The MOTION FAILED (3-8).
Representative Croft MOVED to ADOPT Amendment ADMIN-9:
Legal and Advocacy Services
Public Defender
Add: 825.0
Explanation:
This increment funds items previously reduced or
eliminated to meet shortfalls and items specifically
noted in the 1998 Legislative Audit review of the
Public Defender, including:
474.18 paralegals
26.7 Kodiak investigator
183.2 Travel for rural court locations
100.0 additional computer legal research
40.0 implement case management system
Representative Croft argued in support of the amendment. He
observed that a legislative audit found that the component
needed additional support. He maintained that the Public
Defender is understaffed and does not have sufficient
resources. The amendment would appropriate the level
recommended by the Legislative Budget and Audit Committee
audit. Eight paralegals would be used as a cheaper way to
leverage attorney resources.
Co-Chair Mulder questioned if the average caseload of the
prosecutor was greater than the public defender.
Representative Croft did not know the average caseload of
the prosecutor. Co-Chair Mulder thought that the prosecutor
caseload was greater. Representative Davies pointed out that
prosecutors have greater resources available.
Representative Lancaster acknowledged that the caseload is
great, but the Subcommittee did not have the allocation to
cover the cost.
Representative Croft observed that the caseload has
increased 47 percent since 1988.
A roll call vote was taken on the motion.
IN FAVOR: Moses, Croft, Davies, Bunde
OPPOSED: Foster, Harris, Hudson, Lancaster, Whitaker,
Mulder, Williams
The MOTION FAILED (4-7).
Representative Croft MOVED to ADOPT Amendment ADMIN-10
Division of Motor Vehicles
Add: 170.0 CF
Explanation:
This increment would fund increase cost for Polaroid
contract and is a continuation of the FY01 supplemental
request of $68.0.
Representative Croft spoke in support of the amendment. He
observed that the request would provide photographs for
driver's licenses. He stressed the importance of photos in
enforcing underage drinking.
Representative Lancaster noted that the Division has a new
building being funded and that there was not enough funding
to go around.
Representative Davies expressed concern that new licenses
would be issued without pictures.
Mr. Spencer clarified that the statutes require that new
licenses have a picture. The request would address renewals.
The department is not sure how it would meet the requirement
for photographs on new licenses. The department has
approximately 6 months of remaining supplies.
Co-Chair Mulder clarified that there were no responses to
the department's request for a new contract. Mr. Spencer
stated that the vendors did not respond because of the
state's low volume and roadless areas. A new proposal will
go out in the fall. Other states have also had difficulties.
TAPE HFC 01 - 47, Side A
A roll call vote was taken on the motion.
IN FAVOR: Davies, Moses, Croft, Hudson
OPPOSED: Foster, Harris, Lancaster, Whitaker, Bunde,
Williams, Mulder
The MOTION FAILED (4-7).
Representative Davies MOVED to ADOPT ADMIN-11.
Representative Lancaster OBJECTED.
ADD:
Department Department of Administration
BRU Division of Motor Vehicles
Component Division of Motor Vehicles
FUNDING SOURCE AMOUNT
General Funds $200.0
Representative Davies explained that in FY01, $200.0 was
funded from the Investment Loss Trust Fund (ILTF), a one-
time funding source. The FY02 Subcommittee budget report did
not replace that funding. Co-Chair Mulder stated that there
was an attempt to replace one-time fund sources. He noted
that this item was not related to personal services.
Representative Lancaster explained that the requested amount
related to five employees. Representative J. Davies
countered that would be personal services. He stressed that
those people pay there money, which more than pays for the
services the people want. He stressed that there comes a
time when "more for less" can no longer be provided. He
argued that removing five people form those services would
not be good.
Representative Croft recommended using the fees generated by
those using these services. He asked that the Committee go
$200 thousand over the cap so that those generating the
amount received from those services would be protected.
A roll call vote was taken on the motion.
IN FAVOR: Davies, Moses, Croft, Williams
OPPOSED: Foster, Harris, Hudson, Lancaster, Whitaker,
Bunde, Mulder
The MOTION FAILED (4-7).
Representative Davies MOVED to ADOPT ADMIN-12.
Representative Lancaster OBJECTED.
ADD:
Department Department of Administration
BRU Division of Motor Vehicles
Component Division of Motor Vehicles
F UNDING SOURCE AMOUNT
General Fund/Program Receipts $118.5
Representative Davies explained that the amendment would
fund two staff to conduct performance and financial audits
of 704 private vendor partners, including third party
testers, dealers, and commission agents.
Representative Lancaster did not believe that there were
problems in the referenced area.
Representative Hudson asked the level of performance at this
time in the financial auditing. Mr. Spencer replied that at
this time, there is very little auditing that occurs. If
there is no audit, then there is no awareness whether there
is a problem or not.
A roll call vote was taken on the motion.
IN FAVOR: Davies, Moses, Croft, Hudson, Williams
OPPOSED: Foster, Harris, Lancaster, Whitaker, Bunde,
Mulder
The MOTION FAILED (5-6).
Representative Croft MOVED to ADOPT ADMIN-13.
Representative Lancaster OBJECTED.
ADD:
Department Department of Administration
BRU AK. Longevity Programs Management
Component Pioneers Homes
FUNDING SOURCE AMOUNT
General Fund $2,474.7
Receipts Support Svc. $2,633.0
Representative Croft commented that the amendment would fund
additional beds at the Pioneers Homes. He pointed out the
increased fees paid by the residents at these homes. The
beds could be filled if there were proper staff to care for
these people. He emphasized that there are unfilled beds in
the homes and that the State has a long wait list.
Representative Lancaster countered that even if there are
enough people to fill those beds, there are not enough
nurses to fill the jobs. He mentioned that most of the
folks on the wait list, need one-to-one care. He did not
believe that it would be practical.
Representative Croft agreed that a tight nursing market
exists. He suggested that market wages needs to be paid.
The proposal from the Governor would be to give a preference
to veterans. He reiterated that there are empty beds and
there are people that want to get into those beds.
A roll call vote was taken on the motion.
IN FAVOR: Davies, Moses, Croft
OPPOSED: Foster, Harris, Hudson, Lancaster, Whitaker,
Bunde, Williams, Mulder
The MOTION FAILED (3-8).
BREAK: 7:00 PM
RECONVENE: 7:35 PM
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION AND PUBLIC FACILITIES
Co-Chair Mulder noted that the amendment should be changed
to $879.8 million dollars.
Representatives Williams MOVED to ADOPT DOT-1.
Representative Davies OBJECTED and asked what it would do.
ADD:
Department Department of Transportation
BRU Marine Highway System
Component Southwest Shore Operations
FUND SOURCE AMOUNT
Marine Highway Sys. Fund $60,000
The Marine Highway Stabilization Component requires
additional GF in FY02 in order to maintain baseline service
to the public. Current projections indicate the fund
balance will reach zero in FY02 unless additional GF is
appropriated or service is reduced. Funding of the
increment would allow Alaska Marine Highway System (AMHS) to
continue service uninterrupted through the end of FY02 - a
projected total of 293.1 operating weeks.
He added that the Kennicott Long shoring Expenses, in the
amount of $60.0 Marine Highway System Fund (AMHS) operates
from several privately owned facilities and municipal piers
in Southwest Alaska and Prince William Sound; State or
contract employees are not allowed to handle lines due to a
statewide long shoring agreement. The long shoring costs
for the M/V Kennicott are quadruple that of the M/V
Tustumena. In the winter of 02, the Kennicott will be
providing the only service to Cordova and Kodiak for five
months due to a scheduled overhaul of the M/V Tustumena.
Co-Chair Mulder replied that $879.8 million dollars was the
amount that the Marine Highway had requested. He noted that
there had been concern regarding upcoming increased fuel
costs.
Representative Hudson explained that the amendment would
provide funding for the items in the amendment.
· $60,000 dollars for the Kennicott long shore
expenses;
· $819.8 general funds from the AHFC dividend.
Representative Hudson noted that the money would be used to
compensate for the fuel expenses and the fact that these
monies are no longer available in the Stabilization
component Fund.
Co-Chair Mulder requested the correct reference for the
amendment.
DAVID TEAL, DIRECTOR, LEGISLATIVE FINANCE DIVISION,
explained that the issue would be to keep the same amount of
general funds and add the additional money as Alaska Housing
and Finance Corporation (AHFC) dividends. New language
would need to be added and another $879.8 million dollars
AHFC dividends. The add/delete would be deleted.
Representative J. Davies commented that the language on the
Whittier Tunnel appeared to be "mandatory". He requested
that the Department speak to that concern.
NANCY SLAGLE, DIRECTOR, DIVISION OF ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES,
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION AND PUBLIC FACILITITES, noted
that there is increased activity due to the Whittier Tunnel
opening which does pose a problem for the Department in how
to cover the terminal operations. If the Department does
not receive the additional money to cover those expenses,
the Department will have to reevaluate the services that are
provided. Some services are more mandatory than others.
There will need to be a re-evaluation done by the
Department. Ms. Slagle stressed the need for the $879.8
dollars exists from a variety of reasons. The Stabilization
Fund will be out of money next year.
Representative Davies asked if the seasonal employee was a
long shore man. Ms. Slagle replied that there was one on
contract.
Representative Davies asked the expected revenue increase
that the marketing effort will provide. Ms. Slagle replied
that the Department had completed a marketing study
undertaken by the McDowell Group. That study stated that an
operation the size of the Marine Highway System, should have
a marketing effort of about $2 million dollars; the State
currently has a marketing effort of about $150 thousand
dollars.
Co-Chair Mulder referenced the marketing plan and
recommended that one be submitted for the Legislature to
look over. Ms. Slagle noted that the Department is looking
at marketing the off seasons, which currently do not
generate much revenue.
There being NO OBJECTION, DOT-#1 was adopted.
Representative Moses WITHDREW amendment DOT-#2.
DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL CONSERVATION
Representative Davies MOVED to ADOPT DEC-#1. Co-Chair
Williams OBJECTED.
DELETE:
Environmental Health
Food Safety and Sanitation
Statutory Designated Program ($167.6)
ADD:
Department of Environmental Conservation
Environmental Health
Food Safety and Sanitation
General Fund $221.3
FUND SOURCE AMOUNT
General Fund $221.3
Representative Davies stated that the amendment would fund
one annual routine inspection of the highest risk food
facilities. While this is less than the risk based
inspection frequency analysis and less than the level
recommended by the Food Safety Advisory Committee, it
significantly advances public health protection by ensuring
the highest risk food facilities will be inspected at least
once each year.
Current funding does not adequately protect public health.
· Almost 100% of the risk level four facilities are
being inspected only once per year rather than the
recommended level of four times per year.
· 49% of the risk level 3 facilities are being inspected
once per year rather than the recommended level of
three times per year according to the Risk Based
Inspection Frequency protocol or twice per year as
recommended by the Food Safety Advisory Committee.
· 30% of the risk level 2 facilities are being inspected
once per year rather than the recommended level of
twice per year according to the Risk Based Inspection
Frequency protocol or twice per year as recommended by
the Food Safety Advisory Committee.
Co-Chair Williams commented that his office had been working
with the Department since the closeouts to address the
issue. He acknowledged that there are many problems with
the Department because of finances. He noted that his staff
would be working to address the concern in Anchorage during
the summer.
Representative Davies emphasized that it takes "bodies" to
check restaurants.
TAPE HFC 01 - 47, Side B
Representative Davies stated that there should be a roughly
50/50 division between user fees and general funds. That
was adopted for the other fee structures in the Department
of Environmental Conservation. He commented that the
determination process should not be "rocket science" to do
good business by the Department.
Co-Chair Williams recommended that the facilities should be
inspected once every year. He acknowledged that today
restaurants are being inspected once every two; he agreed
that a problem does exist. Co-Chair Williams stated that to
do it correctly, there needs to be additional money added,
however, he did not believe that $221 thousand dollars would
"address" the problem.
Representative Croft expounded that people have the right to
expect that restaurant inspection be done correctly. He
stressed that the job should be done correctly and should be
fully funded. Representative Croft did not believe that the
funding could be found within the next year, however, stated
that the increment would help. He pointed out that
outbreaks have occurred this year. There is a problem and
he emphasized that the increment is a modest step in the
right direction.
Co-Chair Williams commented that he would be working with
the Department during the interim. He suggested cooperation
in writing up a directive indicating that the State would be
doing the inspections. Co-Chair Williams commented that
perhaps each community should be responsible for that
service.
Representative Croft argued that this service is a statewide
obligation and that the recommendation is modest.
Representative Whitaker inquired the net effect of the
amendment. Representative Davies understood that they would
be statutory designated program receipts that are not
attainable allocation and is replaced with slightly more
general funds.
BARBARA FRANK, DIRECTOR, DIVISION OF ADMINISTRATIVE
SERVICES, DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL CONSERVATION, agreed
that description was correct.
Representative Moses emphasized that this component is a
matter of public safety. If it is ignored, it will become a
serious problem.
Representative Hudson voiced confusion with the amount
allocated in the budget at this time for the service. Co-
Chair Mulder explained that the net effect of the amendment
would be that the gap would get greater by $221 thousand
dollars.
Representative Croft commented that historically, the fees
could be increased providing the authority through the fee
structure. The Department did not believe that they could
increase the fees again this year. The restaurants are
willing to support the inspections. Last year, the
authority to increase the fees was not used.
Co-Chair Williams stated that the Legislature tried to fix
this concern last year. It did not work and the problem
still exists. Co-Chair Mulder interjected that the
increment would be a "band aid" on a bigger problem.
Representative Davies countered that this would not be a
band-aid. He clarified that last year the Division was
given a "hallow" appropriation. Co-Chair Mulder countered
that that last year, they were given statutory designated
program receipt authority to contract with the cities to do
the inspection. Representative J. Davies stated that was
not true.
Ms. Frank explained that last year money was given
specifically for fresh/frozen seafood inspections. Co-Chair
Williams noted that the State was in the same position last
year as it is today.
Representative Hudson asked if the Department had authority
to establish a designated program, someone had to make the
decision not to do that, either the vendors or the
department chose not to solicit. He asked who chose not to
do that. Ms. Frank clarified that the Department went out
to the seafood processors who were the target of the funds,
and they were not willing to enter into a contractual
agreement. They want "real" money to do real inspection and
that money not to be tied to those reasons stated by
Representative J. Davies.
Co-Chair Mulder noted that restaurants and seafood
processors were being interchanged. He inquired how much
went to each. Ms. Frank advised that last year, the $167.6
was specifically intended to be used for one concern. She
noted that the Department does recognize that there is much
more that they could do to coordinate their inspections.
Representative Croft thought that Department of
Environmental Conservation makes very different inspections
than Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). He suggested
the task is simple, either do the inspection or not do it.
Representative Whitaker asked what is "highest risk food
facilities". Ms. Frank explained that the Department has
four different categories of risk facilities. It is based
on the relative risk to public health.
Co-Chair Mulder asked if without adoption of the amendment,
would the process continue at status quo. Ms. Frank stated
it would.
Representative Harris asked if the Department would need $3
million dollars for the whole system.
Representative Whitaker asked if the requested increment
would provide for a yearly inspection at the highest risk
food facilities. He asked if there was legal liability in
not inspecting those facilities. Ms. Frank explained that
she could not speak to the legal liability, however, there
needs to be a reduction to the public health risks.
Co-Chair Mulder questioned if the State had ever been sued.
Ms. Frank was unaware of it.
Co-Chair Williams asked that the Department work with the
Legislature a little more. Ms. Frank stated that the
Department would commit to working with the Department.
Co-Chair Williams WITHDREW his OBJECTION and asked the
Department to work a little more closely with his office to
address the concern. Ms. Frank noted that there would be a
commitment for the Department to work more closely with Co-
Chair Williams office. There being NO further OBJECTION,
DEC-1 was adopted.
Representative Davies MOVED to ADOPT DEC-2. Co-Chair
Williams OBJECTED.
ADD:
Department Department of Environmental Conservation
BRU Office of the Commissioner
Component Office of the Commissioner
FUND SOURCE AMOUNT
General Fund $300.0
Representative Davies explained that the funding was a new
request to provide the State with a systematic monitoring
program of heavy metals and/or persistent organic pollutants
in Alaska's seafood products. The safety of seafood products
is a growing concern in the United States and Europe.
Without a systematic monitoring program, Alaska will be
unable to respond to questions from commercial buyers of
Alaska seafood or recreational and subsistence users as to
the safety of our seafood products.
Representative J. Davies observed that the State would be
unable to respond to federally issued consumption advisories
because we would lack the scientific data to dispute them.
Our inability to credibly challenge these consumption
advisories will ultimately impact the marketing of Alaska's
seafood products, which currently enjoy a major marketing
advantage over other seafood products because of the
perceived purity of our environment.
Representative J. Davies stated that Alaska is one of the
few states without some kind of routine monitoring program
for heavy metals and/or persistent organic pollutants in its
fishery resource.
TAPE HFC 01 - 48, Side A
Representative Davies emphasized that the federal return on
the state expenditure is great.
Co-Chair Williams noted that the EPA indicated that fish
were contaminated. The Department of Environmental
Conservation worked with the EPA to correct the problem. He
observed that federal grants might be available.
Ms. Frank noted that the department believes that they could
use federal funds for a portion or the entire request. She
thought that a 60/40 percent federal/state match program
could be utilized. The department looked at acquiring the
match through the Commercial Fish Loan Fund. There is
sufficient money in the fund to meet the match.
Representative Hudson suggested that it would make a good
Alaska Science and Technology Foundation project.
Co-Chair Williams observed that the state cannot control
contaminates that come from other areas. Co-Chair Mulder
thought that the use of the Commercial Fisherman's Fund has
merit. He stated that he "was a little bit afraid of asking
questions that I am not sure I want to know the answer to."
He emphasized that the focus is to protect the industry.
Representative Foster questioned if the testing is random.
Ms. Frank affirmed. The department has found that federal
alerts do not generally apply to Alaska. The department
wants data to assure that Alaskan fish are clean.
Representative Croft concluded that there is indication that
the state of Alaska's fish are clean and that a through
check could be used to demonstrate that Alaska's fish are
clean.
Representative Harris asked what other states have
monitoring systems. Ms. Frank did not know.
Co-Chair Mulder questioned if the department needs statutory
budgetary authority to use non-point source funds. Ms. Frank
did not think authority was needed for non-point source
funds. She observed that the issue is the match authority.
She suggested that $120 thousand dollars in general fund
match in the seafood component be replaced with Commercial
Fish and Loan Fund receipts. There is already $175 thousand
dollars in the component. This would provide access to cover
the general fund match. Authority to expend the general fund
match on the seafood-monitoring program would be needed.
Co-Chair Mulder recommended that the amendment be held for
further review.
Representative Davies WITHDREW Amendment DEC-2.
Department of Community and Economic Development
Representative Lancaster MOVED to ADOPT Amendment DEC-1:
ADD
BRU: Alaska Seafood Marketing Institute
Component:Alaska Seafood Marketing Institute
Fund Source Amount
Receipt Supported Services $ 700.0
Purpose:
In the FY 02 operating budget submission and
subcommittee review process, the Department of
Community and Economic Development inadvertently
neglected to request an increment for the Alaska
Seafood Marketing Institute (ASMI) to carry forward
their unexpended and unbigoted balance at the end of
FY01. ASMI estimates this amount will be $700.0. This
amendment corrects the omission by DCED.
Representative Lancaster explained that the request would
allow the carry-forward to be spent in the next fiscal year.
There being NO OBJECTION, it was so ordered.
Representative Ken Lancaster MOVED to ADOPT Amendment DCED-
2:
ADD
BRU: Investments
Component:Investments
Fund Source Amount
Rural Development Initiative Fund $43.0
Purpose:
CHAPTER 117 SLA 00 renamed the Rural Development Fund
to the Rural Economic Development Initiative Fund and
added, under Sec. 44.88.6000, the Rural Development
Initiative Fund as a new program to AIDEA. The
Division of Investment will act as the loan-servicing
agency for the program. The Division anticipates a cost
to administer the program of 43.0. This program will
not result in increased staff.
Representative Lancaster explained that the amendment would
give the Division of Investments authority to manage a new
fund in Alaska Industrial Development and Export Authority
(AIDEA). The general fund amount is not affected. There
being NO OBJECTION, it was so ordered.
Representative Davies MOVED to ADOPT Amendment DCED-3:
ADD
BRU: Qualified Trade Association Contract
Component:Qualified Trade Association Contract
General Funds 199.8
A reduction of $199.8 from the tourism-marketing
contract will result in a loss of television
advertising and further erosion of the state's ability
to complete with other destinations. In addition, the
contract requires this amount to be matched by $85.6
from the private sector for a total loss to the program
of $285.4.
Representative Davies spoke in support of the amendment.
Representative Lancaster observed that the subcommittee
funded the item to its ability. Co-Chair Mulder clarified
that a step down was anticipated and that it is consistent
with the plan as designed.
TOM LAWSON, DIRECTOR, ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES, DEPARTMENT OF
COMMUNITY AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT explained that the
legislation that was passed do not completely correspond to
the step down in the Millennium Plan. The legislation
provided a private sector match of 30 percent for FY 01 and
FY02. The budget request was based on $4.8 million because
when the legislation passed it was supposed to be matched 30
percent. The department did not think there was supposed to
be a step down.
Representative Davies WITHDREW Amendment DCED-4.
Representative Croft MOVED to ADOPT Amendment DCED-4:
ADD
BRU: Regulatory Commission of Alaska
Component:Regulatory Commission of Alaska
RCA Receipts 352.9
Addition of seven new positions are needed to ensure
that the RCA continues to maintain a high level of
service to the utility industries and their consumers
in the face of substantial and increasing workload.
The positions to be added are:
Admin Clerk II (Range 8)- Records and Filings Section.
Microcomputer Network Technician I/II Flex (Range
14/16)- I.S. Section.
Communications Common Carrier Specialist (Range 22)-
Common Carrier Section.
Consumer Protection and Information Officer I (Range
14)- Consumer Protection & Information Section.
Paralegal Assistant I/II Flex (Range 13/16)- Commission
Support Section.
Secretary (Range 11)- Commission Support Section
Utility Engineering Analyst III (Range 19)- Engineering
Section.
Representative Croft spoke in support of the amendment. He
noted that the increase would be in receipt-supported
services to continue their work and reduce the backlog. She
pointed out that a change in federal law will bring 600 new
rural water/sewage utilities certifications before the RCA.
He noted that the additional staff would only result in an
increase of .01 cent per month on the bills received.
Representative Lancaster observed that the department
received 11 new employees in 1988, when the telephone
utility deregulated. He questioned where the program
receipts would come from and anticipated that the state
would have to pick up the tab if the new utility
applications are not received.
Representative Croft WITHDREW Amendment DCED-4.
Representative Croft MOVED to ADOPT Amendment CED-5:
Community and Business Development
Grants, Claims (ARDOR Grants)
Fund Source Amount
General Fund $239,320
The ARDOR program appropriation has been $650,000 since
State Fiscal Year 1997. At the time there were 11
ARDORS's sharing the $620,000 of grant funding, or an
average of $56,364 per ARDORs. For State Fiscal Year
2002, there are 14 ARDOR's, the average grant in the
Governor's Budget would be $44,286.
Considering the inflation increase during this period,
each Alaska Regional Development Organization (ARDOR)
would have to receive $61,380 in FY2002 to maintain the
same buying owner that it had in FY1997 (8.9% inflation
increase during this period). The total amount of
grants available for FY2002 would have to be $859,320
(14 x $61380) to maintain that buying power. This
amendment essentially keeps the grants as well as
administration costs up with inflation.
Representative Lancaster noted that the request did not come
before the Subcommittee. He expressed support for the
request but questioned the funding mechanism.
Co-Chair Mulder OBJECTED. He pointed out that the ARDOR
program was created to provide seed money for the
organizations, with the anticipation that they would be
self-reliant.
A roll call vote was taken on the motion.
IN FAVOR: Moses, Croft
OPPOSED: Bunde, Davies, Foster, Harris, Hudson, Lancaster,
Whitaker, Mulder, Williams
The MOTION FAILED (2-9).
Representative Croft MOVED to ADOPT Amendment DCED-6:
Add new BRU:
Renters' Equivalency Rebate
300.0 GF
Representative Croft spoke in support of the amendment. He
observed that the program was the rental portion for senior
and disabled veteran property tax exemption. The program
sent rebates to over 1,000 seniors and disabled veterans in
1998. The average annual payment was $277 dollars. The
program has not been funded for the past two years.
Co-Chair Mulder acknowledged the intent of the program but
maintained that the state of Alaska cannot afford the
program.
A roll call vote was taken on the motion.
IN FAVOR: Moses, Croft, Davies
OPPOSED: Bunde, Foster, Harris, Hudson, Lancaster,
Whitaker, Mulder, Williams
The MOTION FAILED (3-8).
HB 103 and HB 104 were heard and HELD in Committee for
further consideration.
| Document Name | Date/Time | Subjects |
|---|